SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(SC) 57

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.K. MAHESHWARI, SUDHANSHU DHULIA, JJ.
R. Karthik – Appellant
Versus
The State Rep. by Inspector of Police – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 223 of 2024, SLP (Crl.) No. 2179 of 2021
Decided On : 12-01-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : M.A. Chinnasamy, C. Rubavathi, C. Raghavendren, S. Senthil Kumar, Saurabh Gupta, Vinod Kumar Teng, V. Senthil Kumar.
For the Respondents: Ashish Yadav, Joseph Aristotle S.

Headnote:

Conviction - Section 363 IPC - Reduction of Sentence

Fact of the Case:

The appellant was convicted under Section 363 of the IPC for eloping with a 17-year-old girl and was sentenced to 18 months, which was later reduced to 45 days by the Supreme Court.

Finding of the Court:

The Court maintained the conviction but reduced the sentence considering the tender age of the appellant and the victim, as well as the victim's lack of support for the prosecution's case.

Issues: Conviction and sentence under Section 363 IPC

Ratio Decidendi: The reduction of sentence was based on the tender age of the appellant and the victim, as well as the victim's lack of support for the prosecution's case.

Final Decision: The appeal was allowed in part, maintaining the conviction but reducing the sentence from 18 months to the sentence already undergone by the appellant.

ORDER :

1. Leave granted.

2. Assailing the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 21.12.2020 passed by the Madras High Court in Criminal Appeal No. 477 of 2014 for the charge under Section 363 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as ‘IPC’ for brevity) and the sentence of 18 months, the appellant has come before this Court.

3. As per the prosecution allegations, on 14.04.2011, the victim girl aged 17 years eloped with the appellant. Later they solemnized marriage. However, on filing of compliant by the mother of the victim, offence was registered under Sections 363, 376 and 341 of IPC against the appellant along with four other accused persons. Charges were framed under Sections 363, 376 and 341 of IPC. After trial, all the accused persons including the appellant were acquitted for the charges under Sections 376 and 341 of the IPC. The trial Court convicted only the appellant for the charge under Section 363 IPC and directed him to undergo sentence of three years vide judgment dated 14.08.2014 in S.C. No. 45 of 2013.

4. On filing of appeal by the accused-appellant, vide the impugned judgment, conviction under Section 363 IPC was maintained by the High Court but the sentence was reduced to 18 months. However, the conviction and the sentence as directed by the High Court are under challenge in this appeal.

5. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and have perused the material available on record. The appellant and the victim, when eloped, were of tender age (the appellant was of 19 years and the victim was of 17 years). During examination before the Court, the victim had not supported the case of prosecution and had turned hostile. However, considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, while maintaining the finding of conviction, we reduce the sentence of 18 months to the sentence already undergone by the appellant, which, as reported, is 45 days.

6. In view of the above, this appeal is allowed in part. While maintaining the conviction of the appellant for the charge under Section 363 of the IPC, we reduce the sentence from 18 months to the sentence already undergone.

7. As the appellant has been exempted from surrendering vide this Court’s order dated 05.03.2021, which got extended till the disposal of the matter vide order dated 16.04.2021, the appellant is not required to surrender, in connection with this case.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top