SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(SC) 1272

HIMA KOHLI, RAJESH BINDAL
Pradip Sahu – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Somiran Sharma.
For the Respondent: Debojit Borkakati.

ORDER :

1. Leave granted.

2. The appellant is aggrieved by an order dated 17th December, 2021, passed by the Gauhati High Court on an application filed by him1 [under Section 439 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for short ‘the Cr.P.C.’] seeking regular bail in Sootia Excise Circle Case No. 181/2021-222 [registered under Section 53(1)(a) of the Assam Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018]. The High Court has expressed a view that appropriate legal action ought to be initiated against the appellant and those who had tried to misuse the process of law by filing application for bail in two different fora in respect of the very same crime.

3. It may be noted as a background that a bail application was filed by the appellant before the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Biswanath Chariali on 27th October, 2021 in connection with the same case which was rejected.

4. The first bail application moved by the appellant before the High Court was dismissed.3 [on 11th November, 2021] In the second bail application moved by the appellant4 [on 24th November, 2021] notice was issued and the High Court had called for the records on 30th November, 2021.

5. On 01st December, 2021, without awaiting the outc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top