SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 1526

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Ajay Rastogi, B.V. Nagarathna, JJ.
Anil Vasantrao Deshmukh – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. – Respondents
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 4440-4443 of 2022
Decided On : 31-05-2022

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Vikram Chaudhri, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Keshavam Chaudhri, Advocate, Mr. Rishi Sehgal, Advocate, Ms. Ria Khanna, Advocate, Ms. Prabhneer Swani, Advocate, Mr. Devanshu Yadav, Advocate, Mr. Adit Pujari, Advocate, Ms. Anzu. K. Varkey, Advocate, For the Appellant.

The petitioner can file an application for early listing of the bail application before the High Court, and the High Court is urged to dispose of the bail application expeditiously.

Headnote:

Bail Application - Post-Arrest Bail - The court observed that the petitioner can file an application for early listing of his bail application before the High Court and urged the High Court to dispose of the bail application expeditiously.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner's post-arrest bail application was dismissed by the trial Court, and the petitioner sought early hearing of the pending bail application before the High Court.

Finding of the Court:

The court did not examine the issue on merits at this stage but allowed the petitioner to file an application for early listing of the bail application before the High Court.

Issues: Limited complaint about the delay in hearing the pending bail application before the High Court.

Ratio Decidendi: The petitioner is at liberty to file an application for early listing of his bail application, and the High Court is urged to dispose of the bail application expeditiously.

Final Decision: The Special Leave Petitions stand disposed of, and pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

ORDER

1. The limited complaint made by the petitioner for approaching this Court is that his post-arrest bail application which earlier came to be dismissed by the trial Court by an order dated 14.03.2022 has been filed before the High Court on 25.03.2022, although it was listed on few occasions but it appears that due to paucity of time it could not be heard.

2. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that at least he needs indulgence of this Court for early hearing of his pending bail application before the High Court.

3. We are not examining the issue on merits at this stage. However, we consider it appropriate to observe that the petitioner is at liberty to file an application for early listing of his bail application (Criminal Bail Application no. 1021/2022). However, if such an application is filed, we hope and trust that the High Court will take the same on board and will dispose of the bail application as expeditiously as possible.

4. With these observations, the Special Leave Petitions stand disposed of.

5. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top