D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J B PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA
Kuldeep Kumar – Appellant
Versus
U. T. Chandigarh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI.
1. Leave granted.
2. The present appeal arises from an interim order of a Division Bench of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana1[“High Court”] dated 31 January 2024. The order impugned originates in a writ petition alleging electoral malpractices by the presiding officer who conducted the election to the post of Mayor at the Chandigarh Municipal Corporation. The High Court issued notice and listed the petition after three weeks, but it declined to stay the result of the election or grant any other interim relief. The appellant approached this Court assailing the Order and raised serious allegations about the sanctity of the election. With the course the proceedings have taken, this judgment will result in a final order on the writ petition before the High Court.
3. Section 38 of the Punjab Municipal Corporation Act 19762[“Act”], extended to the Union Territory of Chandigarh by the Punjab Municipal Corporation Law (Extension to Chandigarh) Act 19943[Act No 45 of 1994], provides that the Chandigarh Municipal Corporation shall, at its first meeting in each year, elect one of its elected members to be the Mayor of the Corporation. Section 60(a) of t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.