SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
SANJIV KHANNA, DIPANKAR DATTA, JJ.
Snehadeep Structures Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Maharashtra Small Scale Industries Development Corporation Ltd. – Respondent
Civil Appeal No. 3856 of 2024, Arising Out of SLP (C) No. 12063 of 2018
Decided On : 05-03-2024
Interest on Delayed Payments - Small Scale and Ancillary Industrial Undertakings - 1993 Act, Section 3, 4, 5
Fact of the Case:
The court examined the applicability of the Interest on Delayed Payments to Small Scale and Ancillary Industrial Undertakings Act, 1993 to a contractual dispute between the appellant and the respondent. The dispute revolved around the date of payment and the liability to pay interest under the Act.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the proviso to Section 3 of the 1993 Act restricted the contractual rights of the parties to agree on the date of payment, limiting it to 120 days from the day of acceptance or deemed acceptance. The court also clarified the applicability of the proviso to the agreement in question and the computation of interest.
Issues: The issues involved the interpretation of the proviso to Section 3, the calculation of interest, and the applicability of the Act to the contractual agreement entered into before the enforcement of the proviso.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the proviso to Section 3 restricted the contractual rights of the parties, and interest would be payable if the contractual date of payment exceeded 120 days from the day of acceptance or deemed acceptance.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the conclusion of the impugned judgment passed by the Division Bench of the High Court, and clarified the application of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to the case. It also allowed MSSIDCL to seek restitution or enforcement of security if the appellant failed to pay or refund the amount.
JUDGMENT :
1. Leave granted.
2. We have heard learned Senior Advocate appearing for the appellant-Snehadeep Structures Private Limited1 [For short “SSPL”] and the Respondent- Maharashtra Small Scale Industries Development Corporation Ltd.2 [For short “MSSIDCL”]
3. During the course of the hearing, our attention was drawn to Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Interest on Delayed Payments to Small Scale and Ancillary Industrial Undertakings Act, 1993.3 [For short “1993 Act”] For the sake of convenience, the said Sections are reproduced below:
“3. Liability of buyer to make payment - Where any supplier supplies any goods or renders any services to any buyer, the buyer shall make payment therefor on or before the date agreed upon between him and the supplier in writing or, where there is no agreement in this behalf, before the appointed day:
Provided that in no case the period agreed upon between the supplier and the buyer in writing shall exceed one hundred and twenty days from the day of acceptance or the day of deemed acceptance.
4. Date from which and rate at which interest is payable - Where any buyer fails to make payment of the amount to the supplier, as required under section 3, the buyer shall, notwithstanding anything contained in any agreement between the buyer and the supplier or in any law for the time being in force, be liable to pay interest to the supplier on that amount from the appointed day or, as the case may be, from the date immediately following the date agreed upon, at one-and-half time of Prime Lending Rate charged by the State Bank of India.
Explanation - For the purposes of this section “Prime Lending Rate” means the Prime Lending Rate of the State Bank of India which is available to the best borrowers of the bank.
5. Liability of buyer to pay compound interest - Notwithstanding anything contained in any agreement between a supplier and a buyer or in any law for the time being in force, the buyer shall be liable to pay compound interest (with monthly interest) at the rate mentioned in section 4 on the amount due to the supplier.”
4. We would also reproduce the definition clauses (b), (c) and (f) to Section 2, which are applicable, unless the context otherwise requires. The same read thus:
(b) “appointed day” means the day following immediately after the expiry of the period of thirty days from the day of acceptance or the day of deemed acceptance of any goods or any services by a buyer from a supplier.
Explanation - For the purposes of this clause:
(i) “the day of acceptance” means:
(a) the day of the actual delivery of goods or the rendering of services.
(b) where any objection is made in writing by the buyer regarding, acceptance of goods or services within thirty days from the day of the delivery, of goods or the rendering of services, the day on which such objection is removed by the supplier.
(ii) “the day of deemed acceptance” means, where no objection is made in writing by the buyer regarding acceptance of goods or services within thirty days from the day of the delivery of goods or the rendering of services, the day of the actual delivery of goods or the rendering of services.
(c) “buyer” means whoever buys any goods or receives any services from a supplier for consideration.
xxx xxx xxx
(f) “supplier” means an ancillary industrial undertaking or a small scale industrial undertaking holding a permanent registration certificate issued by the Directorate of Industries of a State or Union territory and includes:
(i) the National Small Industries Corporation, being a company, registered under the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956).
(ii) the Small Industries Development Corporation of a State or a Union territory, by whatever name called, being a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956).”
5. The proviso to Section 3 and the amendment to Section 2(f) to include the addition of National Small Industries Corporation and the Small Industries Development Corporation of a State or a Union Territory to the definition of
AI
The court determined that the appellant was not a buyer under the Interest Act, thus not liable for interest on delayed payments.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Interest on Delayed Payment to Small Scale and Ancillary Industrial Undertakings Act, 1993 does not apply to transactions prior to its enf....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the provisions of the MSME Act have an overriding effect on any agreement between the buyer and supplier, and the liability to pay compound....
The MSMED Act mandates that buyers must pay compound interest on delayed payments to suppliers, establishing a statutory right for suppliers to claim such interest irrespective of any agreements to t....
The court upheld the obligation of the petitioners to pay the undisputed amount along with statutory interest, emphasizing that the Council's failure to follow proper procedures rendered the award in....
The lack of conciliation does not undermine the statutory obligation to make payment under the MSMED Act, emphasizing the importance of adherence to payment timelines by the buyer.
In the absence of a contractual agreement for interest, parties are entitled only to a court-determined reasonable interest rate on delayed payments, which in this case was found to be 6% per annum.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.