IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, PRASHANT KUMAR, JJ.
Marsons Electrical Industries – Appellant
Versus
Chairman, Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board (Madhya Pradesh State Electricity Board) And Another – Respondents
Appeal Under Section 37 Of Arbitration And Conciliation Act 1996 No.701 of 2023
Decided on : 12-12-2023
Interest on Delayed Payments - Small Scale Industry - Industrial Development and Regulation Act, 1951, Small Scale Industries Act, 2006, Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 - The judgment discusses the appellant's status as a small scale industry, the promulgation of the Interest on Delayed Payments to Small Scale and Ancillary Undertakings Act, 1993, and the subsequent repeal and replacement by the Small Scale Industries Act, 2006. It also addresses the appellant's application for a Udyog Adhaar Number and the subsequent dispute with the respondent regarding delayed payments and interest. The court analyzes the legal provisions of the MSMED Act, 2006 and its overriding effect on the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and concludes that the appellant is entitled to the benefits of the MSMED Act, 2006 and that the Commercial Court's decision on jurisdiction is incorrect.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant, a small scale industry, entered into a contract with the respondent for the supply of transformers. The respondent failed to make timely payments, leading to a dispute over delayed payments and interest. The appellant filed a claim petition before the Facilitation Council under the Interest on Delayed Payments to Small Scale and Ancillary Undertakings Act, 1993, which was later rejected and replaced by a claim under the MSMED Act, 2006. The respondent challenged the award passed by the Facilitation Council, leading to the instant appeal.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the appellant, registered as a small scale industry since 1971, was entitled to the benefits of the MSMED Act, 2006. It held that the provisions of the MSMED Act, 2006 have overriding effect over the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and that the Commercial Court's decision on jurisdiction was incorrect. The court restored and affirmed the award passed by the Facilitation Council.
Issues: The issues involved the appellant's entitlement to the benefits of the MSMED Act, 2006, the jurisdiction of the Commercial Court, and the validity of the award passed by the Facilitation Council.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the appellant, being a registered small scale industry, was entitled to the benefits of the MSMED Act, 2006, and that the provisions of the MSMED Act, 2006 have overriding effect over the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. It further concluded that the Commercial Court's decision on jurisdiction was incorrect.
Final Decision: The court allowed the instant appeal, set aside the decision of the Commercial Court, and restored and affirmed the award passed by the Facilitation Council.
JUDGMENT :
M.C. Tripathi, J.
1. Heard Sri Alok Kumar Yadav and Sri Shantanu Srivastava, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri Aditya Khandekar, Advocate along with Sri Varun Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent.
FACTUAL MARTIX OF THIS CASE
2. The appellant was engaged in the business of manufacturing transformers of various capacities. The appellant initially was a Proprietorship Firm known as MEI Power Private Limited. However, it was registered as a Private Limited Company with the name of Marsons Electrical Industries but it is now changed to MEI Power Private Limited.
3. The appellant has set up a small scale manufacturing industry in Agra and the same was acknowledged by the Director of Industries as the “small scale industry” and a certificate to that effect was also issued on 9.2.1971. This certification was given under the provisions of the Industrial Development and Regulation Act, 1951. The appellant claims that he has been working as small scale industry since then.
4. The Parliament in its wisdom in the year 1993 had promulgated an Act called ‘Interest on Delayed Payments to Small Scale and Ancillary Undertakings Act, 1993’ (hereinafter referred to as ‘1993 Act’). This Act was later on repealed and a new Act known as ‘Small Scale Industries Act, 2006’ was promulgated in the year 2006.
5. The appellant, who already had a certificate of a small scale industry and was running since 1971 as a small scale industry, after the promulgation of the new Act, applied for certificate, which was issued to the appellant on 29.10.2007 as per the provisions of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as ‘MSMED Act, 2006’). The appellant submitted that the certificate issued in 2006 was actually a continuation of the certificate issued in 1971. Later, the Central Government again modified the rule for small scale industries and all the small scale industries registered under the 2006 Act were supposed to get a Udyog Adhaar Number. The appellant applied for the same and a fresh Udyog Adhaar Number was issued on 10.5.2016. This Udyog Adhaar Certificate clearly showed that it was in continuation of the original certificate of Small Scale Industry, which was issued to the appellant on 9.2.1971.
6. A contract was entered into between appellant and the respondent, M.P. State Electricity Board. Thereafter, various work orders had been issued to the appellant for supply of transformers. The details of the work orders are as follows:-
| S.No. | Dates | Work Order Numbers |
| 1. | 14-10-1993 | 06-01/Ord/14998 |
| 2. | 03-03-1994 | Extn. Order No.06-01/CE(S & P)/SE(P-I)/EE(P-II)/15240 |
| 3. | 10-02-1995 | 06-01/CE(S & P)/SEP-I/EEP-II/15719 Extn.15837 |
| 4. | 11-01-1996 | Extn. Order No.06-01/CE(S & P)/ORD/SEP-I/EEP-II)/16266 |
| 5. | 27-06-1996 | 06-01/CE(S&P)/ORD/SEP-I/EEP-III/16482 |
| 6. | 10-09-1996 | 06-01/CE(S&P)/ORD/SEP-I/EEP-III/Extn-I/16551 |
| 7. | 13-09-1996 | 06-01/CE(S&P)/ORD/SE(P-I)/EE(P-II)/Extn.116575 |
| 8. | 03-12-1998 | 06-01/CE(S&P)/ORD/SE(P-IV)/EE(P-II)/17723 |
| 9. | 10-11-1997 | 06-01/CE(S&P)/ORD/SEP-I/EEP-III)/Extn.-I/17094 |
| 10. | 03-07-1998 | 06-01/CE(S&P)/ORD/SEP-I/EEP-III)/Extn-II/17514 |
| 11. | 22-08-1997 | 06-01/CE(S&P)/SE(P-IV)/ORD/SE(P-I)/EE(P-II)/16957 |
| 12. | 29-06-1998 | 6-01/CE(S&P)/SE(P-IV)/EE(P-II)/17458 |
7. The relevant clauses of the contract are being reproduced hereinunder for ready reference:-
“8. TERMS OF PAYMENT:-
8.1 The supplier shall forward the original RR/MTR and Excise gate pass directly to consignee alongwith copies of following documents:-
(i) A copy of bill
(ii) Delivery challan
(iii) Original copy of excise duty gate pass alongwith photocopy
(iv) The inspection and or T.C. approval
(v) Detailed packing li
Edukanti Kistamma (Dead) through LRs. v. 9. Venkatareddy (Dead) through LRS. & Ors.
Gujarat State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. vs. Mahakali Foods Private Ltd
The MSMED Act, 2006 applies only to delayed payments to Micro and Small Enterprises, and it does not contemplate an independent claim by the Buyer against the Supplier.
The Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act has precedence over the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, allowing parties to reference disputes to the MSEFC despite existing arbitration agre....
The MSMED Act, 2006 provides a specific dispute resolution mechanism that overrides private arbitration agreements, making writ petitions not maintainable when an alternative remedy exists.
If any registration under the MSMED Act is obtained, the same will be prospective and would apply to supply of goods and services subsequent to registration but cannot operate retrospectively. Accord....
The lack of conciliation does not undermine the statutory obligation to make payment under the MSMED Act, emphasizing the importance of adherence to payment timelines by the buyer.
Point of Law : Court are of the unhesitant view that learned Single Judge fell in error in not only entertaining the writ petition but also in allowing the same by setting aside the award dated 28.10....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.