SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(SC) 2096

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
ARUN MISHRA, VINEET SARAN, JJ.
The Kerala State Coastal Zone Management Authority – Appellant
Versus
Maradu Municipality, Maradu & Ors. - Respondents
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).4227-4228/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02-06-2015 in WA No.132/2013 and dated 11-11-2015 in RP No.787/2015 passed by the High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam), SLP(C)Nos.4238-4241 of 2016 & 4231-4234 of 2016 (XI-A)
Decided on : 27-11-2018

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Romy Chacko, Mr. Varun Mudgal, Mr. Shakti Chand Jaidwal, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Mr. Avishkar Singhvi, Adv., Mr. Dhruv Surana, Adv., Mr. Rahul Arya, Adv., Mr. M.T. George, AOR, Mr. V. Giri, Sr.Adv., Mr. Jayanth Muthraj, Adv., Mr. Mohammed Sadique T.A., Mr. Mathew B. Kurian, Adv., Mr. Anu K. Joy, Adv., Mr. Alim Anvar, Adv., Ms. Svadha Shankar, Mr. Amith Krishnan, Adv., Mr. Muthu Charan, Mr. Venkita Subramoniam T.R., Mr. Rahat Bansal, Mr. G. Prakash, Ms. Priyanka Prakash, Mr. Jishnu M.L., Adv., Ms. Beena Prakash, Adv., Mr. Ranjan Kumar, AOR

IMPORTANT POINT
The importance of obtaining a categorical finding on the categorization of the area within the CRZ Category and the legality of construction before taking further action.

Headnote:

Show Cause Notice - CRZ Category - The court constituted a committee to determine the categorization of the area in question and the legality of construction within the CRZ Category, emphasizing the need for a categorical finding before taking further action.

Fact of the Case:

The writ petitions were filed questioning the show cause notice issued for removal of buildings falling within the prohibited area of CRZ Category. The Single Bench allowed the writ petition, but the Division Bench dismissed the writ appeals.

Finding of the Court:

The court considered the lack of a categorical finding on the CRZ category of the area in question and constituted a committee to determine the legality of construction and the precise categorization of the area.

Issues: Categorization of the area within CRZ Category, legality of construction, and the need for a categorical finding before taking further action.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of determining the precise categorization of the area within the CRZ Category and the legality of construction before making any decisions.

Final Decision: The court constituted a Three-Member Committee to determine the categorization of the area and the legality of construction, with a directive to submit a report within two months.

ORDER :

1. The writ petitions filed questioning the show cause notice dated 4.6.2007 issued for removal of the buildings, which according to show cause notice were falling within the prohibited area of CRZ Category. Various violations were mentioned in the show cause notice. Without availing the remedy of filing reply to the show cause notice, writ petitions were filed directly in the High Court. The Single Bench of the High Court vide its judgment and order dated 10.09.2012, allowed the writ petition. Aggrieved thereby, the Municipality preferred writ appeals before the Division Bench, which were dismissed by the impugned judgment and order dated 02.06.2015.

2. Considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, as there is no categorical finding recorded either by the Single Bench or by the Division Bench that whether area in question is in CRZ Category-III, Category-I or Category-II. It was claimed by the petitioner before the Single Bench that they fell within the CRZ Category-II, whereas the case set up by Coastal Zone Management Authority in this Court is that area is of CRZ Category-III. We deem it appropriate to call for the findings on the aforesaid aspect.

3. We constitute a Three-Member Committee consisting of the Secretary to the Local Self Government Department, the Chief Municipal officer of the concerned Municipality and the Collector of the District, to hear the objections and to give a finding in terms of Notification dated 19th February, 1991.

4. Let the Committee hear the affected parties as well as Kerala State Coastal Zone Management Authority and State Government and consider the matter as submitted by the parties and send a report to this Court as to legality of construction and precisely in which category the area in question is to be categorized and whether building is in prohibited zone. Let the exercise be done within a period of two months and a report be submitted to this Court.

5. Let the report be submitted covering the aspect that may be urged by the parties as to the legality of construction.

6. List in the 3rd week of February, 2019.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top