SANJAY KAROL, ARAVIND KUMAR
Prem Raj – Appellant
Versus
Poonamma Menon – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Sanjay Karol, J.)
Leave granted.
2. Appellant herein challenges judgment and order dated 23rd January, 2018 passed in Crl.R.P. No.1111 of 20111[‘Impugned Judgment’], whereby the High Court of Kerala allowed, only in part, his Revision Petition against the judgment and order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Thrissur,2[‘Lower Appellate Court’] dated 11th January, 2011, in Criminal Appeal No.673 of 2007, which, in turn, upheld his conviction, as handed down by the learned Judicial First Class Magistrate3[‘Trial Court’] vide order dated 14th August, 2007 in CC No.51 of 2003, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 18814[‘N.I. Act’].
3. The sole issue that we are required to consider is, whether, a criminal proceeding can be initiated and the accused therein held guilty with natural consequences thereof to follow, in connection with a transaction, in respect of which a decree by a competent Court of civil jurisdiction, already stands passed.
4. The facts necessary to put into perspective the issue in the present appeal are:-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.