1. Article 32 writ petition for GIB conservation; court modifies previous blanket prohibition on overhead transmission lines in GIB priority and potential areas. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 51 , 52 )
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI., J B Pardiwala, Manoj Misra, JJ.
M K Ranjitsinh & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
Union of India & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 838 of 2019 And with Civil Appeal No. 3570 of 2022
Decided On : 21-03-2024
1. Article 32 writ petition for GIB conservation; court modifies previous blanket prohibition on overhead transmission lines in GIB priority and potential areas. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 51 , 52 )
2. Conservation of GIB requiring undergrounding of transmission lines versus feasibility concerns and conflict with renewable energy and climate change mitigation obligations. (Para 4 , 7 , 52 , 53 , 60 , 61 , 62 )
3. Court recalls blanket prohibition on overhead transmission lines, appoints Expert Committee to assess undergrounding feasibility and bird diverters, and directs submission of report. (Para 61 , 62 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 72 , 73 , 74 )
The court held that a blanket prohibition on overhead transmission lines is not justified; the matter is best left to domain experts who can assess feasibility case by case, balancing GIB conservation with sustainable development and international climate commitments. (Para 52 , 53 , 60 , 61 , 62 )
The court recognized that Articles 14 and 21 give rise to a right to be free from adverse effects of climate change, distinct from the right to a clean environment, as climate change impacts life, equality, and health. (Para 24 , 25 , 27 )
Yes, the court held that courts must be alive to international climate obligations when adjudicating writ petitions, even if not enacted domestically, as these obligations inform the context of balancing conservation with sustainable development. (Para 56 , 58 )
The court held that environmental policy decisions requiring technical assessment are best left to domain experts; courts must rely on expert committees for feasibility assessment rather than issuing a priori sweeping directions without full understanding of technical implications. (Para 61 , 62 )
The court held that conservation of endangered species and climate change mitigation are not binary choices but exist in dynamic interplay; both goals must be pursued without sacrificing either, as they are equally crucial and interconnected. (Para 53 , 60 )
JUDGMENT :
Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI.
| Table of Contents | |
| A. | The Great Indian Bustard |
| B. | The judgment dated 19 April 2021 and subsequent developments |
| C. | The mission to combat climate change |
| I. India’s commitment under international conventions | |
| II. The right to a healthy environment and the right to be free from the adverse effects of climate change | |
| III. Importance of solar power as a source of renewable energy | |
| IV. Climate change litigation in other jurisdictions | |
| D. | The reasons for the modification of the judgement dated 19 April 2021 |
1. The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked for protecting the Great Indian Bustard1[“GIB”] and the Lesser Florican, both of whom are on the verge of extinction. Given the importance of the issue at hand, a brief background of various aspects which pertain to the matter are discussed below.
A. The Great Indian Bustard
2. The GIB (the scientific name of which is ardeotis nigriceps) is native to southern and western India. It typically occupies grasslands or arid regions. The State of Rajasthan is home to a majority of the current population. With time, the country has seen a rapid and steady decline in the population of the GIB. As of 2018, the International Union for Conservation of Nature, or IUCN as it is popularly known, classified the GIB as a ‘critically endangered’ species. In IUCN’s system of classification, only two categories indicate a graver threat to a particular species – ‘extinct in the wild’ and ‘extinct’. The GIB has been classified as a critically endangered species from 2011 until the most recent assessment in 2018. From 1994 to 2008, it was classified as ‘endangered’ and in 1988, it was labelled ‘threatened’. IUCN notes the justification for its classification of the GIB as a critically endangered species in the following terms:2[IUCN Red List, ‘Great Indian Bustard’ https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/22691932/134188105#population]
“This species is listed as Critically Endangered because it has an extremely small population that has undergone an extremely rapid decline owing to a multitude of threats including habitat loss and degradation, hunting and direct disturbance. It now requires an urgent acceleration in targeted conservation actions in order to prevent it from becoming functionally extinct within a few decades.”
3. The Rajasthan government estimated that only about 125 GIBs were present in the year 20133[Government of Rajasthan, Forest Department, ‘Project Great Indian Bustard’ https://forest.rajasthan.gov.in/content/raj/forest/en/footernav/department-wings/project-great-indian-bustard.html] while IUCN placed the number of mature GIBs between 50 and 249.4[IUCN Red List (n 2).] There are significant factors bearing upon the dwindling numbers and low rate of reproduction of the existing population of these species. Pollution, climate change, predators and competition with invasive species are among the many threats that exacerbate the challenges faced by these vulnerable species. The attrition of the existing population of these endangered birds has been partly attributed to overhead transmission lines. GIBs usually lay a single egg which has an incubation period of approximately one month. The GIBs nest on open ground or in cavities in the soil. Consequently, their eggs are also laid and incubated on the ground. The eggs are therefore at risk of being preyed upon by local predators including mongooses, monitor lizards, and other birds. Cows may also trample on or crush the eggs while grazing in the grasslands. The loss of habitat is also a serious concern. As humans have expanded their settlements and economic activities into the grasslands, the natural habitat of the GIB has diminished. The expansion of human population and accompanying activities has also resulted in the fragmentation of the GIB’s habitat. The expansion of infrastructure such as roads, mining and farming activities ha
AI
The court established the need for balancing conservation of critically endangered species with infrastructure development, mandating expert involvement in decision-making processes for sustainable e....
Particular piece of land is earmarked for public or communal purpose, it shall not be alienated even after change of classification of the land.
Court ruled that judicial orders must balance individual rights with pressing public interest, particularly in flood mitigation infrastructure projects, as outlined in the Specific Relief Act.
The court upheld the authority of a transmission company to construct electric lines without landowner consent under relevant statutes, emphasizing public interest and necessity over individual prope....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.