IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Sandeep Mehta, Vinod Kumar Bharwani, JJ.
Jal Grahan Vikas Sanstha - Petitioner
Vs.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan - Respondent
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8472, 13818 of 2021
Decided On : 31-03-2022
Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 20A - Rajasthan Land Revenuer Rules, 2007 - Rule 12A - No avail because even in said judgment, this Court has held Special provisions for contract relating to infrastructure project – Held, Support of contention that land has been allotted for solar power project in violation of Rules of 2007 is of no avail because even in said judgment, this Court has held that Rule 12A of Rules of 2007 does not debar State Government from allotting land in favour of an entrepreneur for developing solar park, if is otherwise permissible in terms of Rules of 2007 - As defined under Rule 2(jjj) “Solar park” is a group of solar plants/solar power plants/solar PV power plants/solar thermal power plants/solar farms in same location used for production of electric power - In Kalyan Singh’s case (supra), Division Bench cancelled allotment of lands covered by public utility for power project in question - However, in present case, going by admitted entries in revenue record, no part of allotted land is covered by public utilities or restricted lands and hence, allotment order in question is perfectly in tune with Rules of 2007 - In addition thereto, we may take note of Section 20A of Specific Relief Act, 1963 which reads as below – petitions dismissed.
ORDER :
Sandeep Mehta, J.
1. These two petitions termed to be Public Interest Litigation question, orders No.1307 and 1317 dated 23.4.2021 whereby, the State Government has allotted chunks of land to the respondent M/s. SBE Renewables Ten Projects Private Limited for establishing a solar project in the village Riwadi.
2. The Solar Energy Corporation of India (a Govt. of India enterprise) issued a Letter of Award in favour of the respondent M/s. SBE Renewables Ten Projects Private Limited (hereinafter to be referred as ‘the company’) for establishing Inter State Transmission System Connected Wind Solar Hybrid Power Projects (Tranche-I). In furtherance of the said Award, the State Government sanctioned allotment of lands to the company on lease basis for establishing the solar project. The petitioners are opposed to the allotment of the land so made to the company for establishing the solar power plant.
3. Before entering into the merits of the case, we would like to extract the quotes of world leaders, scientists and environmentalists on the aspects of climate change and its impact which, by use of renewable energy, can help in reversing the process of global warming which has started having a serious adverse impact on the world at large.
“India plans to produce 450 GWS of power through solar energy and other renewable energy sources by 2030”
^^gj pht lw;Z ls iSnk gqbZ gS] lw;Z ÅtkZ dk ,dek= L=ksr gS vkSj lkSj ÅtkZ lcdk [;ky j[k ldrh gS^^
-Hon’ble Prime Minister of India
Shri Narendra Modi
“I’d put my money on the sun and solar energy. What a source of power! I hope we don’t have to wait until oil and coal run out before we tackle that.
-Thomas Edison, 1931
“And no challenge poses a Greater threat to future generations than climate change.”
“no challenge – no challenge - poses a greater threat to future generations than climate change.”
-President Barack Obama
State of the Union Address 2015
“The time is past when humankind thought it could selfishly draw on exhaustible resources. We know now the world is not a commodity.”
Francois Hollande on Climate Change
President of the French Republic
4. In this background, we are examining the challenge laid in this Court by the petitioners to the allotment of land made in favour of ‘the company’.
5. Before proceeding to deal with the matters on merits, few important preceding facts and events as they transpired during the course of hearing need to be highlighted.
6. Both these writ petitions were listed in the Court on 23.03.2022 on which date, arguments were commenced in the pre-lunch session. The petitioner’s counsel addressed the Court for a significant period of time. The Bench rose for lunch with a clear understanding that the arguments would be resumed in the post lunch session. However, when the arguments were resumed postlunch, the petitioner’s counsel Shri Moti Singh was not available and his associate Advocate Shri Joginder Singh persistently made a request to adjourn the matters. Since, significant judicial time had already been consumed in hearing the cases in pre-lunch session, the Court proceeded to hear the arguments of the respondents’ counsel and thereafter, waited for the petitioner’s counsel to appear but he did not turn up in the Court till the Board was finished and the Court rose for the day and accordingly, the order was reserved in both the writ petitions giving liberty to the petitioner’s counsel to submit written submissions. The matters were posted for dictation of order today. The Registry has apprised this Court that in the intervening period, the petitioner’s counsel moved an application to Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice alleging that the hearing of the matter was closed in an arbitrary manner and thus, the same should be listed before Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice. The said application stands rejected by Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice.
7. Shri Moti Singh, learned counsel representing the petitioner has presented written s
before making the allotment the State Authorities were required to set apart the land for access to the lands of the khatedar tenants, their dhani and the public utilities and the entries
The allotment of land to the respondent companies was illegal and violative of the provisions of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955, and the Rules made thereunder.
The court emphasized the need for local authorities' input in land allotment decisions to ensure compliance with community needs and statutory obligations.
Preamble to the 2003 Act, emphasize upon the promotion of efficient and environmentally benign policy of the State to encourage generation and consumption of green energy to sub-serve the mandate of ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.