SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.R. GAVAI, SANDEEP MEHTA, JJ.
Sanjay Chaudhary And Anr. – Appellants
Versus
Pioneer Urban Land & Infrastructure Ltd. And Anr. – Respondents
Civil Appeal No(S).1454 of 2023
Decided on : 10-04-2024.
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – Section 23[Consumer Protection Act, 2019 – Section 67] – Real estate – Flat-Buyers Agreement – Respondent-developer failed to handover possession of flat to appellants-homebuyers by scheduled date – Appellants being homebuyers, had made payment of 90% of total sale consideration of flat in question to respondent-developer – Commission erred in directing that respondent-developer shall be entitled to charge interest @ 9% per annum from appellants-homebuyers on balance amount (except stamp duty and registration charges) from 14th November, 2017 till date of payment – Part of impugned order whereby respondent-developer has been permitted to charge interest at the rate of 9% per annum on balance amount quashed and set aside. (Paras 4, 5, 6 and 7)
Facts of the case:
Appellants herein are aggrieved by direction passed by National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission giving liberty to respondent-developer to charge interest @9% per annum on balance amount (except stamp duty and registration charges) from 14th November, 2017 till date of payment from appellants-homebuyers.
Findings of Court:
Upon payment being made, possession of flat in question shall be handed over to appellants forthwith and not later than a period of 30 days from the date of final payment being made.
Result : Appeal disposed of with directions.
ORDER :
Mehta, J.
1. This appeal is directed against the final order dated 23rd January, 2023 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter being referred to as ‘Commission’) whereby, the learned Commission, while allowing the Consumer Case No. 612 of 2018 filed by the appellants, issued the following directions: -
2. The appellants herein are aggrieved by the direction passed by the learned Commission giving liberty to the respondent developer to charge interest @9% per annum on the balance amount (except stamp duty and registration charges) from 14th November, 2017 till the date of payment from the appellants homebuyers.
3. We have heard and considered the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the impugned order and the material placed on record.
4. It is admitted that the appellants being the homebuyers, had made payment of 90% of the total sale consideration of the flat in question to the respondent-developer till 23rd June, 2014. The said amount runs to nearly Rs.2,21,56,942.42/- (total consideration for 4111 sq. ft super area and amenities being Rs.2,38,20,932/-).
5. Admittedly, the respondent-developer failed to handover the possession of the flat to the appellants-homebuyers by the scheduled date i.e. 16th March, 2014 upon which the consumer dispute came to be registered.
6. In this background, we are of the view that the learned Commission erred in directing that the opposite party i.e. respondent-developer shall be entitled to charge interest @9% per annum from the appellants-homebuyers on the balance amount (except stamp duty and registration charges) from 14th November, 2017 till the date of payment. Thus, the said part of the impugned order whereby, the respondent-developer has been permitted to charge interest at the rate of 9% per annum on the balance amount is quashed and set aside.
7. We direct the respondents to convey the outstanding amount to the appellants within a period of two months from today and upon payment being made, the possession of the flat in question shall be handed over to the appellants forthwith and not later than a period of 30 days from the date of final payment being made.
8. The appeal is disposed of in the above terms.
9. Pending application, if any, shall stand(s) disposed of.
Flat-Buyers Agreement – Developer is bound to handover possession of flat to homebuyer by scheduled date.
The court applied various provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, Sale of Goods Act, Transfer of Property Act, and Stamp Act to determine the rights and obligations of the parties in a dispute ove....
Consumers are entitled to interest on amounts paid from the date of payment when services are not rendered as agreed, reinforcing consumer protection rights.
Flat Buyer Agreement – Delay in delivery of possession – Rate of interest on amount of refund cannot be less than that as provided in agreement.
The court confirmed the right to interest for delayed possession, noting the absence of force majeure and completion certificate.
(1) Justified Withholding of Payments – An allottee is not necessarily “at fault” for stopping installments if it is evident that the builder is nowhere near completing the project by the committed d....
Flat Buyer’s Agreement – Denial of timely possession despite substantial payment – Payment of interest on refund of principal amount is necessary.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.