SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(SC) 1825

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA
Santhosh Narasimha Murthy – Appellant
Versus
Mantri Castles Private Limited – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha, Sr. Adv., Mr. Govind Jee, AOR, Mr. Omanakuttan K K, Adv., Mr. Parul Dhurve, Adv., Mr. Naveen Soni, Adv., Mr. Ayush Mishra, Adv., Mr. Shekhar G Devasa, Adv., Mr. Manish Tiwari, Adv., Ms. Thashmitha Muthanna, Adv., Mr. Prashant Dixit, Adv., Mr. Vishwanath Chaturvedi, Adv., Mr. Shashi Bhushan Nagar, Adv., M/S. Devasa & Co., AOR
For the Respondents: Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha, Sr. Adv., Mr. Govind Jee, AOR, Mr. Omanakuttan K.K., Adv. , Mr. Shekhar G Devasa, Adv., Mr. Manish Tiwari, Adv. Ms. Thashmith Muthanna, Adv., Mr. Prashanth Dixit, Adv., Mr. Viswanath Chaturvedi, Adv., Mr. Shashi Bhushan Nagar, Adv., M/S. Devasa & Co., AOR, Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR, Ms. Snehal Uday Kanzarkar, Adv., Mr. Shailja Nanda Mishra, Adv., Mr. Harsh Singh Rawat, Adv., Mr. Bishwajit Bhattacharyya, Sr. Adv., Mr. Chandrachur Bhattacharyya, Adv., Mr. Sahil Tagotra, AOR

Table of Content
1. home buyers' complaint regarding possession. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. court's previous orders on possession. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. pending issues on compensation and interest. (Para 7 , 8)
4. terms of buyer agreements regarding compensation. (Para 9 , 10)
5. interest entitlement and calculations. (Para 11 , 12 , 15)
6. court's reasoning on interest rates. (Para 13 , 14 , 16)
7. final compensation and interest ruling. (Para 17)
8. conclusion and dismissal of pending applications. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)

ORDER :

Civil Appeal No 8418 of 2022

1. A set of sixty-two home buyers instituted a consumer complaint claiming that the first respondent had failed to deliver possession of the flats which had been purchased by them under home buyer agreements.

2. The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1[“NCDRC”] granted permission to sue in a representative capacity under Section 12 (1)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act 1986 on 1 December 2020. As a consequence, the complaint assumed the character of a class action. The NCDRC found that there was a delay on the part of the developer in handing over possession. It partially allowed the complaint in the following terms :

    “… The

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top