SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 1931

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, ABHAY S. OKA
Madhya Pradesh Jan Vikash Party – Appellant
Versus
Election Commission of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Varun Thakur, Varinder Kumar Sharma.

ORDER :

1. The election process under the representation of the People Act, 1951 is monitored by a Constitutional Authority like Election Commission. Electronic Voting Machines (EVM) process has been utilized in our Country for decades now but periodically issues are sought to be raised. This is one such endeavor in the abstract. It appears that party which may not have got much recognition from the electorate now seeks recognition by filing petitions.

2. We are of the view that such petitions must be deterred and thus dismiss this petition with costs of Rs. 50,000/- to be deposited with Supreme Court Group-C (Non-Clerical) Employees Welfare Association within a period of four weeks from today.

3. Pending applications stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top