SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(SC) 404

SURYA KANT, K. V. VISWANATHAN
Supreme Court Bar Association – Appellant
Versus
B. D. Kaushik – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Parties : Adish C. Aggarwala, Sukumar Pattjoshi, Arijit Prasad, Dinesh Kumar Goswami, Narender Hooda, S. Wasim Ahmed Qadri, Pratap Venugopal, Meenesh Kumar Dubey, Yugandhara Pawar Jha, Amrendra Kumar Singh, Vibhu Shanker Mishra, Kumar Gaurav, Shashank Shekhar, Vikas Gupta, Chanchal Kumar Ganguli, Manish Goswami, Anil C. Nishani, Upendra Mishra, Vikas Singh, Deepika Kalia, Nitin Saluja, Keshav Khandelwal, Vasudha Singh, Kumud Lata Das, Aman Anand, Savitri Pandey, Indu Kaul, Reepak Kansal, Pooja Rathore, Rubina Jawed, Akanksha Kohli, Milind Kumar, Shivaji M. Jadhav, Yugandhara Pawar Jha, Parmanand Pandey, Birendra Kumar Choudhary, Arun Kumar, Utkarsh Pandey, Karan Kaushik, Pareena Swarup, Dinesh Kumar Garg, Dhananjay Garg, Abhishek Garg, D.K. Garg, Ishaan Tiwari, R.P. Bansal, Chanakya Gupta, Chaudhary Shamshuddin Khan, B.P. Nilaratna, Ujjawal Gaur, Rishabh Sahu, Hema Sahu, Rajendra Sahu, K.R. Chitra, Vivek Sharma, Priya Hingorani, Naseem Ahmed.

1. In continuation of order dated 23.04.2024, the Observer Committee, constituted by us, has submitted its report. As per the said report all the eight resolutions put up before the Supreme Court Bar Association, Special General Body Meeting held on 30.04.2024 have failed for want of 2/3rd majority of the members present and voted. The brief description of all the resolutions has also been given in its report by the Committee. The resolutions inter-alia recommended:

    (i) That previous resolution dated 15.10.2014 resolving that no member of the Bar shall be eligible to hold any one post for more than four years in his/her life time should be recalled.

(ii) That the eligibility conditions to contest for the post of Office Bearers of SCBA, including the length of practice at Bar and the fee to be deposited should be revised.

(iii) That the admission fee for the members in SCBA should be amended and revised.

(iv) That the deposit fee and eligibility for candidates to contest for various posts in SCBA Executive Committee be revised and suitably enhanced.

(v) That the admission fee for the membership for SCBA in future be suitably revised and enhanced.

(vi) That the requirement of existing numb

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
          whatsapp-icon Back to top