ABHAY S. OKA, UJJAL BHUYAN
Hanna – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
1. The appellants are accused who have been convicted by the Trial Court for offences punishable under Sections 302 and 323, read with Sections 149, 147, and 148 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The appellants have been sentenced to life imprisonment for the offence of culpable homicide amounting to murder punishable under Section 302, and separate sentences have been imposed for the other crimes. All sentences were directed to run concurrently.
2. The incident took place on 5th October 1995. PW-1/Nanhi Bahu (mother of the deceased - Pappu @ Har Narayan) alleged that the appellants killed her son. The allegation is that the appellants were carrying different weapons, and they assaulted her son.
3. None of the material prosecution witnesses except PW-3 (Santosh), the deceased's brother, supported the prosecution. The rest of the alleged eyewitnesses were declared hostile. PW-1 was also declared hostile as she did not support the prosecution. However, after her recall, she supported the prosecution.
SUBMISSIONS
4. The learned senior counsel appearing for the appellants (accused no. 2 to 6) in Criminal Appeal No. 468/2024 pointed out that PW-1 did not support the prosecution. However, afte
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.