SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(SC) 559

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
ABHAY S. OKA, PANKAJ MITHAL, JJ.
Thatireddigari Maheswara Reddy - Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.2132 of 2011
Decided on : 08-07-2024

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mr. D.Rama Krishna Reddy, Adv. Mr. Nishant Sharma, Adv. Ms. Adviteeya Sharma, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Ms. Prerna Singh,Adv. Mr. Guntur Pramod Kumar, AOR Mr. Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki, AOR

IMPORTANT POINT
Murder – Only because an eye witness is a member of deceased's family, per se, evidence of such a witness cannot be discarded – If evidence of an eyewitness who is a close relative of deceased is cogent, reliable and credible, it can always be relied upon.

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 148 and 302 [Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 – Sections 191 and 103] – Rioting and murder – Conviction – No material contradictions or omissions have been brought on record in cross-examination of PWs – Only because an eye witness is a member of deceased's family, per se, evidence of such a witness cannot be discarded – If evidence of an eyewitness who is a close relative of deceased is cogent, reliable and credible, it can always be relied upon – There is no dispute about identity of accused – There was a recovery of hunting sickles at instance of accused persons – Handles of hunting sickles were found stained with human blood – There is no delay in lodging complaint – Medical evidence is consistent with prosecution case – Appeal dismissed. (Paras 6, 7, 8 and 9)

Facts of the case:

Appellant-accused no.2 has been convicted for offences punishable under Sections 148 and 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860. There were eleven accused who were charged with murder of deceased by hacking him with hunting sickles. Accused were charged with offences punishable under Sections 120B, 148 and 302 of IPC.

Findings of Court:

Respondent state shall take appropriate decision within a period of two months from the date on which appellant-accused no.2 surrenders.

Result : Appeal dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

ABHAY S. OKA, J.

FACTUAL ASPECTS

1. The appellant-accused no.2 has been convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 148 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, ‘the IPC’). There were eleven accused who were charged with the murder of one Shiva Prasad Reddy (for short, ‘the deceased’) by hacking him with hunting sickles. The accused were charged with offences punishable under Sections 120B, 148 and 302 of the IPC.

Accused nos.5 and 9 died during the pendency of the trial. The Trial Court found that the charge under Section 120B of the IPC has not been proved against any accused. The Trial Court also found that accused nos.6, 7 and 8 were not guilty of any offence and were acquitted. The Trial Court convicted accused nos.1 to 4 and accused nos.10 and 11 for the offences punishable under Sections 148 and 302 of the IPC.

2. Apart from the present appeal, there were appeals preferred by the coaccused bearing Criminal Appeal nos. 2130 and 2131 of 2011. By the order of this Court dated 13th July 2023, the appeals were disposed of as the learned counsel representing the appellants therein made a statement that the appellants have been granted permanent remission. Therefore, they were not pressing the appeals. The appellant, in this appeal, was enlarged on bail. However, the order dated 13th July 2023 records the statement of the learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant-accused no.2 has decided to surrender so that his application for permanent remission can be considered. Therefore, this Court directed that after surrendering, if an application is made by the appellant-accused no.2 for a grant of permanent remission, the same shall be decided within six weeks from the date of making the application. However, the order dated 4th October 2023 records that the appellant-accused no.2 has changed his mind and decided not to surrender. In the said order, it is recorded that the learned counsel appearing for the appellant-accused no.2 stated that the appellant-accused no.2 wants to prosecute the appeal on merits.

3. PW1 and PW3 are brothers of the victim of the offence, who are the eyewitnesses. Apart from PW1 and PW3, PW2 was also an eyewitness. The prosecution's case is that the deceased was a practising lawyer at Gooty. The deceased and his brothers were residing in Peddavadugur village. Every day, the deceased used to travel from his residence to the Court at Gooty by his motorcycle. The deceased had contested the election for the post of President of the Water Users Association of Peddavadugur village against the appellant-accused no.2. The election was won by the appellant-accused no.2. The allegation is that accused no.1 and other communist party leaders helped the appellant-accused no.2. A couple of months after the election, the Excise Police raided the house of the appellant-accused no.2 and seized illicit brandy and accordingly, a case was registered against accused no.2. According to the prosecution case, the appellant-accused no.2 suspected that the deceased was responsible for the raid and seizure. The incident occurred on 26th July 1997. Twenty days before the said incident, the Congress party had convened a meeting in the village, and the deceased was elected as convenor of the Congress party. It is the case of the prosecution that the Excise Police also booked a case against accused no.1, who carried an impression that the deceased was responsible for the action taken by the Excise Police. On the date of the incident, the deceased left the village between 9:00 am and 9:30 am and proceeded to the Court at Gooty. On the same day, PW1 to PW3 had visited Pamidi village. After completing the work, at 5:00 pm, the three prosecution witnesses boarded a truck at Pamidi, which gave them a lift to Miduthuru crossroads. After getting down from the truck, they were waiting for a conveyance to reach their village. In the meanwhile, they saw the deceased coming from Gooty side on his motorcycle. While

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top