Bhim Rao Ambedkar Vichar Manch Bihar vs State of Bihar

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(SC) 596

VIKRAM NATH, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
Bhim Rao Ambedkar Vichar Manch Bihar – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Ms. Indira Jaisingh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Deepak Jain, Adv. Mr. K.b. Deepak, Adv. Mr. Vaibhav Manu Srivastava, AOR Ms. Jaspreet Aulakh, Adv. Ms. Anoushka Singh, Adv. Ms. Dashampreet Kaur, Adv. Ms. Twinkle Gupta, Adv. Mr. Sajal Gupta, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Manish Kumar, AOR Mr. Shivam Singh, Adv. Ms. Shaswati Parhi, Adv. Mr. Suyas Vyas, Adv. Mr. Divyansh Mishra, Adv. Ms. Bahul Sharma, Adv. Mr. Shyamal Kumar, AOR Mr. Bittu Singh, Adv. Mr. Prakash Singh, Adv. Mr. Vinay Ojha, Adv. Mr. Vishwajit Singh, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Jasprit Singh Rai, Adv. Ms. Sukhdip Kaur, Adv. Ms. Monica Sharma, Adv. Mr. Navin Prakash, AOR Mr. Amrish Kumar, AOR Mr. Anilendra Pandey, AOR Mr. C.p.singh, Adv. Mr. Rajeev Kumar Ranjan, Adv. Ms. Priya Kashyap, Adv. Mr. Salman Khurshid, Sr. Adv. Ms. Lubna Naaz, AOR Mr. Zafar Khurshid, Adv. Mr. Amit Singh Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Mohit Kochhar, Adv. Mr. Amrish Kumar, AOR Mr. Neeraj Shekhar, AOR Mr. Amrendra Singh, Adv. Mr. Ram Bachan Choudhary, Adv. Mr. Ramendra Vikram Singh, Adv. Mrs. Kshama Sharma, Adv. Mr. Jayesh Gaurav, Adv. Mr. Ishwar Candra Roy, Adv. Ms. Diksha Ojha, Adv. Mr. Ranjan Nikhil Dharnidhar, AOR

JUDGMENT :

Vikram Nath, J.

Application(s) for intervention/impleadment is/are allowed.

2. Leave granted in SLP (CIVIL) No. 18294 of 2021.

3. These two appeals assail the correctness of the judgment and order dated 3rd April, 2017 passed by the Division Bench of the Patna High Court whereby a group of four (4) writ petitions and one Letters Patent Appeal were decided by a common judgment dismissing all the five cases. The challenge in the writ petitions and the appeal before the Division Bench of the High Court was to a Notification dated 1st July, 2015, whereby the State Government had passed a resolution based upon consideration of recommendations by the State Backward Commission which had recommended that in the list of Extremely Backward Classes published under the Bihar Reservation of Vacancies in Posts and Services (for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and other Backward Classes) Act, 1991, the caste "Tanti-Tantwa" recorded at Serial No.33 be deleted and the said "Tanti-Tantwa" be merged in the Scheduled Castes list with the caste 'Pan/Sawasi' mentioned at Serial No.20 so that they could get benefit of the Scheduled Castes. The operative part of the Resolution as contained in th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2024 Supreme(SC) 596

VIKRAM NATH, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRABhim Rao Ambedkar Vichar Manch Bihar – AppellantVersusState of Bihar – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

VIKRAM NATH, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
Bhim Rao Ambedkar Vichar Manch Bihar – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent