PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, PANKAJ MITHAL
D. Khosla and Company – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
PANKAJ MITHAL, J.
1. Heard Smt. Jyoti Mendiratta, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. Aishwarya Bhati, learned A.S.G. for the Union of India.
2. In connection with a contract of 1984-85 between the petitioner and the respondent, an award came to be passed by the Arbitrator on 17.09.1997 under the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940.1 [hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’] It was made the rule of the court under Section 14 read with Section 17 of the Act and a decree was accordingly drawn.
3. The award vide its paragraph 12 provided for the interest on the amount awarded. The interest was awarded for two periods viz. (i) from the date of completion of the work up to the date of the award @ 12% per annum (simple interest) and (ii) @ 15% per annum from the date of the award till the date of its payment or the date of the court decree, whichever is earlier.
4. The portion of the award which is relevant for our purpose concerning interest is reproduced herein-below:
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.