HIMA KOHLI, SANDEEP MEHTA
Rajkaran Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Mehta, J.
1. Heard.
2. Leave granted.
3. The present appeal by special leave, is preferred on behalf of the appellants, assailing the judgment dated 25th April, 2017 passed by the High Court of Delhi in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3543 of 2017, dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellants and upholding the judgment dated 4th October, 2016 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter being referred to as the ‘Tribunal’) in Original Application Nos. 60 of 2013 and 459 of 2013. The Tribunal had rejected the appellants’ claim for benefits of the replacement scales of the Revised Pay Rules, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as ‘RP Rules’) in accordance with the 6th Pay Commission Report, with effect from 1st January, 2006.
Brief facts: -
4. The facts in a nutshell, are that the appellants (Appellant No. 1 to Appellant No. 6) were appointed to manage the Compulsory Saving Scheme Deposits (hereinafter referred to as SSD) Fund of the Special Frontier Force (hereinafter referred to as SFF) in various positions such as Junior Accountant, Accountant, Upper Division Clerk (UDC), and Lower Division Clerk (LDC), on running pay scales. The SSD Fun
State of Karnataka & Ors. v. M.L. Kesari & Ors.
Surinder Singh and Another v. Engineer-in-Chief, C.P.W.D. and Another
State of Punjab & Ors. v. Jagjit Singh & Ors.
Union of India v. Dineshan K.K.
Randhir Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
Ajay Hasia and Others v. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi and Others, (1981) 1 SCC 722 [Para 23
Pradeep Kumar Biswas v. Indian Institute of Chemical Biology and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.