SUDHANSHU DHULIA, PANKAJ MITHAL
Sk. Golam Lalchand – Appellant
Versus
Nandu Lal Shaw @ Nand Lal Keshri @ Nandu Lal Bayes – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
PANKAJ MITHAL, J.
1. Heard Shri Rauf Rahim, learned senior counsel for the appellant and Shri Pijush K. Roy, learned senior counsel for the respondent No. 1.
2. The dispute in this Civil Appeal is about the property measuring more or less 6 Cottahs 1 Chittack and 30 sq. ft. along with 17 rooms (about 4395 sq. ft. which comprises of tile sheds/huts) situate at 100/3 Carry Road, Howrah.
3. The plaintiff-respondent Nandu Lal claims that he had acquired rights in the aforesaid property through his father late Salik Ram along with his other brothers and that Brij Mohan, his cousin, the son of his uncle late Sita Ram, had no exclusive right to sell the property in favour of anyone much less to one of the tenants S.K. Golam Lalchand, the defendant-appellant.
4. The Title Suit No. 212/2006 filed by the plaintiff-respondent Nandu Lal was dismissed by the court of first instance as he failed to prove his possession but in appeal the decree was reversed and the suit was decreed disbelieving the family settlement and holding that there was no partition of the property. The judgment and order of the First Appellate Court was affirmed by the High Court in Second Appeal.
5. Aggrieved by the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.