SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 890

RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA
Umesh Singh – Appellant
Versus
Kapildeo Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants : M/s K. N. Choubey, Sr. Adv., Sumit Kumar.
For the Respondents: Mr.Rana Ishwar Chandra.

Rudra Prakash Mishra, J.—The present appeal has been filed against the judgment dated 24.06.1978 and decree dated 04.07.1978 passed by 2nd Additional Sub Judge, Monghyr in Title Suit No. 116 of 1973/3 of 1977 by which the learned Court below has been decreed the suit in favour of the plaintiffs.

2. For better appreciation of case, the parties shall be referred according to their status before the lower Court.

3. The case of the plaintiffs (respondents herein) is that the plaintiffs and defendants 1st parties are joint family governed by the Mitakshara School of Hindu Law and are related to each others as Shown in the Genealogical Table given below:—

Kuldip Singh

Died 1947

Narsingh Singh

(Died 1940)

Mathura Singh

(Defendant 1)

Sarjug Singh

(Plaintif 1)

Ambika Singh

Wife-Tilo Kumari

Wife -Dasho Devi

(Defendant 2)

Son-Kapildeo (Plaintif 2)

Son-Kapildeo (Plaintif 4)

Daughter- Chandra kumari (Defendant 4)

Daughter-Sunita Devi (Defendant 3)

Son-Arjun Singh (Plaintif 3)

 

The common ancestor Kuldip Singh (father) owned and possessed landed properties mentioned in Schedule "A" of the plaint. In the life time of Kuldip Singh, the eldest son Narsingh S

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top