SURYA KANT, UJJAL BHUYAN
Arvind Kejriwal – Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau of Investigation – Respondent
JUDGEMENT
SURYA KANT, J.
Leave granted.
2. These appeals are directed against the judgements and orders dated 05.08.2024 passed by the High Court of Delhi (hereinafter, ‘High Court’), dismissing the Appellant’s challenge to his arrest being illegal as well as his application for the grant of regular bail. Consequently, the High Court upheld the legality of the Appellant’s arrest and has summarily declined to exercise its concurrent jurisdiction under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter, ‘CrPC’), thereby denying his prayer for regular bail.
FACTS:
3. At the very outset, it is essential to advert to the brief factual background to provide context to the manner in which the present proceedings have arisen.
3.1. The Appellant is a public representative and has been elected thrice the Chief Minister of the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (hereinafter ‘GNCTD’). He also happens to be the National Convenor of Aam Aadmi Party, a political party in India.
3.2. Central Bureau of Investigation (hereinafter ‘CBI’) – the Respondent registered an FIR No. RC0032022A0053 (hereinafter ‘FIR’), on 17.08.2022 under Sections 120B read with Section 477A of the Indi
Kanumuri Raghurama Krishnam Raju Vs. State of A.P.
Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar
Arvind Kejriwal v. Directorate of Enforcement
Central Bureau of Investigation v. Anupam J. Kulkarni
Gudikanti Narasimhulu v. Public Prosecutor
Joginder Kumar Vs. State of U.P.
Sidhartha Vashisht alias Manu Sharma Vs. State (NCT of Delhi)
Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.