IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUMEET GOEL
Amit Kumar Singal – Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau Of Investigation – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SUMEET GOEL, J.
CRM-31794-2025
This is an application under Section 528 of BNSS , 2023 for placing on record the reply filed on behalf of respondent-CBI.
Application is allowed as prayed for, subject to all just exceptions. Reply is taken on record. Registry to paginate the paper-book accordingly.
CRM-30428-2025
As the main petition has been allowed, no order is required to be passed in the instant application. CRM stands disposed of.
CRM-M-37123-2025
1. Present petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNS S , 2023 for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.RC0052025A0011 dated 31.05.2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 61 (2) of , 2023 and Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 as also Sections 7 -A of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Section 308 (2) of , 2023 (added later on) at Police Station CBI, ACB, Chandigarh.
2. The gravamen of the allegations, as set out in the FIR, is that the petitioner, in active collusion with co-accused Harsh Kotak is involved in an FIR/regular case registered by the CBI under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Section 61 (2) of BNSS , 2023. It is alleged that both the
Kanumuri Raghurama Krishnam Raju vs. State of A.P.
Chief Justice of A.P. vs. L.V.A. Dikshitulu
National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Laxmi Narain Dhut
Management of Advance Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Shri Gurudasmal and others
Tinsukhia Electric Supply Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Assam
A direct application for bail to the High Court is permissible in exceptional circumstances, although the Sessions Court is the preferred forum for such applications.
The court emphasized the constitutional right to timely bail hearings, mandating that bail applications be resolved within two weeks, aligning with the principles of justice and the presumption of in....
(1) Bail jurisprudence is a facet of a civilised criminal justice system. An accused is innocent until proven guilty by a competent court following the due process.(2) Delhi Liquor scam – Power to ar....
Anticipatory bail applications under S.438 must typically be filed in the Sessions Court first, unless exceptional circumstances are demonstrated.
The High Court has the authority to grant bail under Section 389(2) despite prior denials by subordinate courts, maintaining concurrent jurisdiction to enhance access to justice.
(1) Anticipatory bail – Court which grants anticipatory bail must take care to specify offence or offences in respect of which alone order will be effective – Blanket order of anticipatory bail is bo....
Anticipatory bail applications must first be filed in the Sessions Court, respecting the hierarchy of courts.
Direct approach to High Court for anticipatory bail must follow Sessions Court application unless exceptional circumstances exist.
Anticipatory bail is an extraordinary remedy that must be justified by circumstances, balancing the rights of the accused against the interests of justice and effective investigation.
The High Court has concurrent jurisdiction with the Sessions Court to grant anticipatory bail, but should only entertain direct applications in exceptional circumstances.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.