SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(SC) 792

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
VIKRAM NATH, PRASANNA BHALACHANDRA VARALE, JJ.
Rabina Ghale & Anr. – Petitioners
VERSUS
Union of India & Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 265 of 2022
WITH
Anjali Gupta – Petitioners
VERSUS
Union of India & Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 250 of 2022
Decided On : 17-09-2024

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr. Adv. Ms. Astha Sharma, AOR Mr. Nipun Saxena, Adv. Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Adv. Ms. Mantika Haryani, Adv. Mr. Simranjeet Singh Rekhi, Adv. Ms. Rashmi Singh, Adv. Ms. Muskan Surana, Adv. Ms. Mehreen Garg, Adv. Ms. Aadya Pandey, Adv. Mr. Ajit Sharma, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. K.N. Balgopal, Adv.Gen., Nagaland/Sr. Adv. Mr. Visto Rio, Adv. Mr. C. K. Sasi, AOR Ms. Meena K Poulose, Adv. Ms. Vanshaja Shukla, AOR Ms. Ankeeta Appanna, Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR

IMPORTANT POINT
Sanction for prosecution – In absence of previous sanction criminal proceedings cannot continue.

Headnote:

Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958 – Section 6 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 197 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 302, 307, 326, 201, 34 IPC r/w 120-B – Section 4 – Killing of Army Personnel and civilians in Nagaland – Sanction under Section 6 of Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 19581 has since been declined by competent authority – In view of specific bar contained in Section 6 of AFSP Act, 1958 which provides that no prosecution, suit, or other legal proceedings can be instituted except with previous sanction of Central Government with respect to exercise of any power conferred under said Act, proceedings based on impugned FIRs cannot continue any further – Proceedings arising from impugned FIRs deserve to be quashed – Proceedings pursuant to impugned FIRs shall remain closed – However, in case sanction is granted at any stage under Section 6 of AFSP Act, 1958, proceedings pursuant to impugned FIRs may continue and may proceed in accordance with law and be brought to a logical conclusion. (Paras 3, 4, 6 and 8)

Facts of the case:

Petitioner are seeking writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ quashing Suo motu FIR bearing State Crime Police Station (SCPS) Case registered by Respondent No.2, Complaint dated 07.12.2021 by the Respondent No.3, Findings and recommendations of SIT constituted by Respondent No.2 dated 24.03.2022 seeking sanction to prosecute husbands of Petitioners along with 28 other Team members u/s 302, 307, 326, 201, 34 IPC r/w 120-B IPC and for initiating disciplinary action against entire team as per provisions of Army Act and Rules, and all other ancillary proceedings emanating out of said FIR.

Findings of Court:

In case, if ultimately at some stage, sanction is granted under Section 6 of AFSP Act, 1958, proceedings pursuant to the impugned FIRs are liable to be continued.

Result : Writ Petitions allowed.

JUDGMENT

VIKRAM NATH, J.

1. The Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 265 of 2022 and Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 250 of 2022 have been filed with the following prayers:

    “(i) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ quashing the Suo moto FIR bearing State Crime Police Station (SCPS) Case No. 07/2021 registered by Respondent No.2, Complaint dated 07.12.2021 by the Respondent No.3, the Findings and recommendations of the SIT constituted by the Respondent No.2 dated 24.03.2022 seeking sanction to prosecute the husbands of the Petitioners along with 28 other Team members u/s 302, 307, 326, 201, 34 IPC r/w 120-B IPC and for initiating disciplinary action against the entire team as per the provisions of the Army Act and Rules, and all other ancillary proceedings emanating out of the said FIR and/or in furtherance of the incident dated 04.12.2021, being against the mandate of law and being solely targeted at attacking soldiers in exercise of their bona fide duties of upholding the dignity of Indian Flag;

    (ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing the Respondents to desist from engaging in such arbitrary exercises of executive power which impairs the normal and bona fide functioning of the Army in the area;

    (iii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing the Respondent authorities to issue guidelines to protect the Rights of soldiers so that no soldier is harassed by initiation of criminal proceedings for bona fide actions in exercise of their duties, as mandated by the Union of India, in protection of sovereignty, integrity and dignity of the Country;

    (iv) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing that adequate compensation is provided to the effected serving personnel and their families, who have been unnecessarily embroiled in mala fide criminal proceedings in discharge of their bona fide duties;

    v) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing the local Police authorities to investigate and file Charge-sheet in the FIR No. 27/2021, instituted by 21 PARA (SF) and prosecute the perpetrators for Terrorist Activities against the unruly, violent and armed mob led to the martyrdom of Paratrooper Gautam Lal, grievous injuries to the entire Operations team and the four civilian drivers, the loss of property by burning the four civil pattern vehicles which had come to extricate the team from the site of the incident, the loss of weapons and ammunitions snatched away from the team and which were burned once the vehicles were set on fire, while discharging duties as ordered by the Central Government; Alternatively,

    vi) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing that investigation of the said FIR No. 28/2021 to be carried out in another state with independent and unbiased investigating agencies;

    vii) Pass any other appropriate writ/order/direction as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

2. Without going into detailed facts, it would be relevant to quote an order dated 19.07.2022 passed by this Court in the above two writ petitions, as the said order incorporates the crux of the matter:

    “Issue notice.

    Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, learned Advocate-on-Record accepts notice on behalf of the Union of India and Ministry of Defence.

    These Writ Petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, have been filed by the wives of officers of the Indian Army for quashing of Suo Moto FIR, bearing State Crime Police Station (SCPS) Case No.07/2021 registered against the personnel of 21 PARA(SF), Unit of the Indian Army including the respective husbands of the Writ Petitioners under Sections 302, 307, 326, 201, 34 read with Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) the findings and recommendations of the Special Investigation Team (SIT) dated 24th March 2022 constituted by Respondent No.2. The proceedings in this case emanate out of an incident dated 4th December 2021 which led to a firing

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top