SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(SC) 847

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.V. NAGARATHNA, NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH, JJ.
Bachpan Bachao Andolan – Petitioner
VERSUS
Union of India & Anr. – Respondents
Writ Petition (C) No. 558 of 2019
Decided On : 24-09-2024

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Ms. Taruna Panwar, Adv. Mr. Aditya Goel, Adv. Mr. Abhaid Parikh , AOR
For the Respondent(s): Ms. Tulika Mukherjee, AOR Mr. Amrish Kumar, AOR Mr. Bijender Chahar, A.S.G. Ms. Swarupama Chaturvedi, Adv. Mr. Bhuvan Kapoor, Adv. Mr. Digvijay Dam, Adv. Mr. Abhimanyu Tewari, AOR Ms. Eliza Bar, Adv. Ms. Swarupama Chaturvedi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Abhaid Parikh, AOR Ms. Katyayani Anand, Adv. Ms. Saumya Singh, Adv. Mr. Aayush Shivam, Adv. Ms. Kavita Chaturvedi, Adv. Mr. Manish Kumar, AOR Mr. Sachin Patil, AOR Mr. H.S. Phoolka, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Bhuwan Ribhu, Adv. Ms. Rachna Tyagi, Adv. Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, Adv. Ms. Shashi, Adv. Mr. Anjani Kumar Mishra, AOR Mrs. Hardeep Kaur Mishra, Adv. Mr. Praveen Mishra, Adv. Dr. Ravi Abhilash, Adv.

State governments are legally required to implement safety guidelines for schools to ensure the protection of children, as mandated by the RTE Act and related provisions.

Headnote:

Accountability - School Safety - RTE Act, 2009; CrPC, 1973; Juvenile Justice Model Rules, 2016 - The court emphasized the mandatory implementation of safety guidelines for schools, highlighting the responsibilities of state governments under the RTE Act and related provisions to ensure child safety.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking directions for the implementation of safety guidelines for children in schools, emphasizing the need for accountability from school management in both government and private institutions.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the Union of India had substantially complied with the guidelines and directed state governments to notify and implement these guidelines, ensuring the safety and security of children in schools.

Issues: Whether the state governments are mandated to implement the safety guidelines for children in schools as per the directives of the Union of India.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that state governments have a legal obligation to notify and implement the guidelines for school safety, as established under the RTE Act and other relevant laws.

Result: The writ petition is disposed of with directions to state governments to implement the safety guidelines.

ORDER

The petitioner - Bachpan Bachao Andolan has preferred this writ petition as a public interest litigation seeking the following reliefs:

    “(a) Pass an appropriate writ/order/direction in the nature of mandamus directing to the Respondents to notify the "Fixing Accountability of School Management towards Safety and Security of Children in SchoolGuidelines" prepared by the Department of School Education & Literacy, Ministry of Human Resource Development (MoHRD) in consultation with the National Commission for the Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR);

    (b) Pass an appropriate writ/order/direction to the Respondents, declaring that the contents of the Draft Accountability Guidelines shall be mandatorily implemented and applied in all cases of hardships upon children who are in schools, both government and private. The schools, both government and private, need to protect their children from risk of natural disaster, health hazard, abuse, violence and accidents.

    (c) Pass an appropriate writ/order/direction to the Respondents to implement the "Fixing Accountability of School Management towards Safety and Security of Children in School-Guidelines" which lays down the responsibilities of school management towards ensuring safety and security of children in schools, both government and private.

    (d) For an appropriate action to the respondents to pass such other order or orders as deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that an application for amendment of the petition has been filed and the same may be allowed. There being no objection to the said application and having regard to the scope and ambit of this writ petition as well as the prayers sought for by the petitioner herein, the said application is allowed.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that an amended memorandum of Writ Petition has been filed. The same is taken on record. The amended writ petition has also sought the following reliefs –

    “(a) direct all the State and UT Governments to immediately and mandatorily notify the Guidelines on school safety and Security, 2021 issued by the Ministry of Education on 08.10.2021, in compliance of the order dated 17.04.2018, passed by this Hon’ble Court in the matter being W.P. (Crl.) 136/2017 and W. P. (Civil) 874/2017, within a defined timeline and submit their compliance reports;

    (b) direct the Centre and State Government to further issue directions to schools across India, to take immediate action and enquire well-being of the child, during situations where children remain absent for more than 30 days or intermittently drop off School;

    (c) issue directions to the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) and State Commission for Protection of Child Rights (SCPCRs) across India for the effective implementation of the Guidelines; and further direct the NCPCR and SCPCR for a time bound monitoring of the Guidelines; and

    (d) pass such other or further order(s) as may be deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”

4. During the course of submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner drew our attention to the guidelines which have been framed by Union of India/respondent No.1 and sought a direction to all the State Governments and Union Territories to notify the guidelines and to comply with the same.

5. Learned counsel for the Union of India/respondent No.1 submitted that the prayers sought for by the petitioner herein have been complied with substantially by the Union of India. It is for the State Governments to implement those guidelines and therefore, appropriate orders may be made in the writ petition.

6. Learned counsel for respondent No.2/National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR), while adopting the said submission also submitted that suitable directions may be issued to the State Governments to comply with the said guidelines by notifying the same and NCPCR may also be empowered to monitor the implementation of the s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top