Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, CJI, J.B. Pardiwala, Manoj Misra, JJ.
Atul Kumar – Petitioner
Versus
The Chairman (Joint Seat Allocation Authority) and Others – Respondents
Writ Petition (Civil) No 609 of 2024
Decided On : 30-09-2024
Education – Admission into Indian Institute of Technology Dhanbad for a four year Bachelor of Technology course in Electrical Engineering – Petitioner was diligent in accessing the portal and did everything within his power to secure realization of his admission – Admission of petitioner has been delayed for no fault of his – A talented student like petitioner who belongs to a marginalized group of citizens and has done everything to secure admission should not be left in lurch – Power of Supreme Court under Article 142 of Constitution to do substantial justice is meant precisely to cover such a situation – Petitioner should be granted admission to IIT Dhanbad against seat which was allotted to him in branch of Electrical Engineering – Petitioner will be admitted to same batch to which he would have been admitted in pursuance of order of allotment – Petitioner is ready and willing to pay fees which may be paid over personally at the time when admission is granted to him – A supernumerary seat shall be created for petitioner, if so required, for the purpose of complying with this order and no existing student shall be disturbed in consequence – Petitioner would be entitled to all consequential benefits of admission, including allotment of hostel accommodation and other facilities. [Article 142 of Constitution of India] (Paras 6 and 7)
Facts of the case:
Petitioner is a meritorious student. He belongs to Scheduled Caste category. He appeared for JEE (Advanced) 2024 Examination and secured a rank of 1455 in his category. He was allotted a seat at Indian Institute of Technology Dhanbad for a four year Bachelor of Technology course in Electrical Engineering.
Findings of Court:
Since admission of petitioner has been delayed for no fault of his, Director of IIT Dhanbad, requested to use his good offices to ensure that petitioner can duly complete course work for the period which has already elapsed during this academic year. This will ensure that petitioner is abreast of his class and does not suffer for delay in granting him admission.
Result : Petition disposed of with directions.
ORDER
1. The petitioner is a meritorious student. He belongs to the Scheduled Caste category. He appeared for the JEE (Advanced) 2024 Examination and secured a rank of 1455 in his category. He was allotted a seat at the Indian Institute of Technology Dhanbad for a four year Bachelor of Technology course in Electrical Engineering. This was the second attempt and, therefore, the last chance for the petitioner to secure admission since only two attempts are permissible. The petitioner has disclosed that his father is a daily wager. The petitioner completed his higher secondary education from Khatauli, District Muzaffarnagar, Uttar Pradesh. The family income is below the poverty line.
2. The time frame for the completion of online reporting, including the payment of fees and uploading of documents was till 5 pm on 24 June 2024. The petitioner has stated that his parents arranged the funds required for the payment of fees. The fees were deposited in his brother’s account by 4.45 pm. The petitioner states that he logged into the portal of the first respondent at 4.45 pm and applied in the ‘float category’ of admission and uploaded the documents. The portal closed at 5 pm and his payment was not processed.
3. The petitioner thereafter addressed an email to the first respondent. A response was received on 26 June 2024 from the IIT Bombay Office for JEE (Advanced) redirecting the candidate to the organizing IIT, which is IIT Madras. Eventually, these attempts did not bear any fruit.
4. The petitioner approached the Jharkhand High Court Legal Aid Service Committee and he was directed to the Legal Services Committee of the Madras High Court. A writ petition was instituted before the High Court of Madras, but when the case came up for hearing, he was advised to approach this Court.
5. The facts as they have been revealed before this Court indicate that there is no dispute about three critical aspects: (i) the allotment of the seat in Electrical Engineering to the petitioner at IIT Dhanbad; (ii) the Scheduled Caste status of the petitioner; and (iii) the steps which were taken by the petitioner to comply with all formalities pursuant to the allotment to him of a seat for the course.
6. Counsel appearing on behalf of the first respondent has furnished to the Court the log-in details of the petitioner, which indicate that he was diligent in accessing the portal and did everything within his power to secure the realization of his admission. The petitioner logged in on 24 June 2024 between 15.12 hours and 16.57 hours, on as many as six occasions. This evidently indicates that he was making earnest efforts to log into the portal. There is no conceivable reason why the petitioner would not have done so if he had the wherewithal to pay the fees of Rs 17,500. A talented student like the petitioner who belongs to a marginalized group of citizens and has done everything to secure admission should not be left in the lurch. The power of this Court under Article 142 of the Constitution to do substantial justice is meant precisely to cover such a situation.
7. We accordingly order and direct that the petitioner should be granted admission to IIT Dhanbad against the seat which was allotted to him in the branch of Electrical Engineering. The petitioner will be admitted to the same batch to which he would have been admitted in pursuance of the order of allotment. The petitioner is ready and willing to pay fees of Rs 17,500, which may be paid over personally at the time when admission is granted to him. A supernumerary seat shall be created for the petitioner, if so required, for the purpose of complying with this order and no existing student shall be disturbed in consequence. The petitioner would be entitled to all the consequential benefits of admission, including allotment of hostel accommodation and other facilities.
8. Since the admission of the petitioner has been delayed for no fault of his, we request the Director of IIT Dhanbad to use his good offices to
Admission – A talented student who belongs to a marginalized group of citizens and has done everything to secure admission into a premier Institute, should not be left in lurch – Power of Supreme Cou....
The Supreme Court exercised jurisdiction under Article 142 to ensure a Dalit student's admission to IIT despite fee payment complications, highlighting issues of justice and the digital divide.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding nature of the Rules of Business on all participants and the consequences of non-compliance with the grievance redressal mechanism.
The High Court will not interfere with established academic admission deadlines and eligibility criteria under its Article 226 jurisdiction, as such interference would disrupt the orderly conduct of ....
The court emphasized the principle of restitutive justice, allowing admission under exceptional circumstances where the candidate is not at fault for administrative errors.
The judgment emphasizes the need for equitable consideration of students' challenges in making online payments and the importance of addressing technical issues in the admission process.
The court ruled that administrative delays in issuing validity certificates should not penalize eligible Scheduled Tribe candidates in educational admissions, advocating for equitable treatment under....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
