Back
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, SANJAY A. DESHMUKH
Shaikh Riyan Shaikh Eqbaloddin – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Ravindra V. Ghuge, J. - Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by the consent of the parties.
2. The petitioner has put forth prayer clauses (B) and (C), as under :-
C) Till pending hearing and final disposal of this writ petition, petitioner may kindly be allotted seat in NIT Nagpur."
3. On 22/12/2022, after hearing all the parties, we have passed the following order :-
2. The petitioner has placed before us the print out that he has obtained from the website of the IndusInd Bank pertaining to the statement of his ban
The judgment emphasizes the need for equitable consideration of students' challenges in making online payments and the importance of addressing technical issues in the admission process.
Strict adherence to the timeline and irreversible seat cancellation for non-payment of the fee as per the Business Rules. The court emphasized the uniform application of the Business Rules and cited ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding nature of the Rules of Business on all participants and the consequences of non-compliance with the grievance redressal mechanism.
Non-payment of the seat acceptance fees as required by the JoSAA 2023 Business Rules leads to cancellation of the allocated seat and exclusion from further rounds of seat allocation.
A procedural mistake by a student may be excused when it risks depriving a meritorious candidate of their admission, emphasizing the importance of justice over strict adherence to rules.
The court ruled that admissions under the NRI quota must adhere to existing rules, and arbitrary changes post-admission are invalid.
Rectification measures can be taken to correct technical glitches in the admission process, and candidates are not entitled to benefit from inadvertent errors.
Merit and entitlement for seat allocation in educational institutions depend on adherence to procedural norms, alongside validation of certificates; mere claims of wrongdoing by the institution do no....
Point of law: Occasion to consider the nature of relief that can be granted to a student after the last date of admissions in case it was found that the said candidate was denied admission illegally.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
