Sajjan Singh vs Jasvir Kaur - 2023 Supreme(SC) 1314

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(SC) 1314

A. S. BOPANNA, M. M. SUNDRESH
Sajjan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Jasvir Kaur – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Himanshu Sharma, Mr. Ram Niwas Sharma, Ms. Aditi Sharma, Mr. Nitin Sharma, Mr. Nikhil Bajaj, Mr. Digvijay Singh Raghav, Mr. L.S. Mann, Mr. Arun Kumar, Mr. Rahul Jasoria, Ms. Anshita
For the Respondent: Mr. Abhinay, Ms. Sumati Jund, Mr. L.K. Srivastava

Table of Content
1. appeal disposed along with pending applications. (Para 2 , 8)
2. high court allowed revision petition and rejected plaint. (Para 3)
3. grievances concerning court fee and prayer adequacy are for trial. (Para 4 , 5)
4. high court order is set aside; case restored. (Para 6)
5. contentions in application open for written statement. (Para 7)

ORDER :

1. Leave granted.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant as also the learned counsel for the respondents and perused the appeal papers.

3. In a suit filed by the appellant herein, the respondents filed an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short ‘CPC’) which was, at the first instance, dismissed by the Trial Court through its order dated 30.10.2017. The respondents were therefore before the High Court in a Revision Petition. The High Court having considered the matter, has through its order dated 25.03.2019, allowed the Revision Petition, and as a consequence, the application filed under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC was allowed and the plaint was rejected. It is in that light, the appellant is before this Court.

4. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, we have taken note t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document