RAJEEV KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA
Manglesh Shrivastava – Appellant
Versus
Mahraban – Respondent
ORDER
1. The order dated 1.10.2020 and 1.12.2020 passed by civil Judge Class-I, Morena in Civil Suit No.91A/2020, have been called in question by way of present revision, whereby the Court below has partially dismissed the applications under Order 7 rule 11 (B)(D) CPC and under Order 7 rule 11(C)(D) CPC filed by the present petitioner/ defendant.
2. Briefly stated facts of the case are that the respondents/plaintiffs filed Civil Suit No. 91A/2020 before Civil Judge Class-1, Morena, District Morena, with the pleadings that the respondents/plaintiffs are the Bhumiswami and possession holder of the disputed property. Earlier, disputed property was in the ownership of the mother of the respondents/plaintiffs. After the death of respondents/plaintiffs' mother, the respondents/plaintiffs and their father became the registered owner of the property in question. After the death of father of the respondents/plaintiffs on 20.1.2019, respondents/plaintiffs became the owner and possession holder of the disputed property. According to the petitioner/defendant, she purchased the property from the father of the respondents/plaintiffs by registered sale deed dated 23.12.2014 challenging which the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.