SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, SURYA KANT, JJ.
Rajkumar and Others – Petitioners
Versus
The State of Uttar Pradesh and Others – Respondents
Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 36 of 2022
Decided On : 11-03-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. prisoners' eligibility for premature release clarified. (Para 1) |
| 2. counsels agree to consider petitioners' representations. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. petitioners permitted to submit representations. (Para 4) |
| 4. petition disposed of as per statements made. (Para 5 , 6) |
ORDER :
1. An affidavit has been filed by the Superintendent of Jail, District Jail, Ghaziabad, inter-alia, stating that:
2. Mr. Nagendra Singh, counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, states that the above clarification would resolve the grievance of the petitioners and their representations may now be directed to be considered by the competent authority expeditiously.
3. Ms. Preetika Dwivedi, counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, states that if the petitioners submit fresh representations, the representations shall be considered within a period of three months.
4. We accordingly permit the petitioners to submit representations for their release. The representations shall be considered and disposed of in terms of the statement which has been made in the counter affidavit expeditiously and orders communicated in any event within a period of three months of the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order by the competent authority.
5. The petition is accordingly disposed of in the above terms.
6. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
The State must adhere to its own legal provisions for considering cases of premature release in a fair and transparent manner.
(1) Premature release of life convicts – Application for premature release has to be considered on the basis of policy as it stood on the date when accused was convicted of offence by trial court – I....
The policy prevailing at the time of conviction is crucial for considering premature release of life convicts, and convicts opting to undergo sentence in open air jails are entitled to the benefit of....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the policy prevailing at the time of conviction governs the grant of remissions, and the commission of jail offences should not be a sole grou....
Premature release is not an inherent right of a convict and is subject to the discretion of the State Government based on various factors including the conduct of the convict in jail and the nature o....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.