VIKRAM NATH, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
Shyam Kumar Inani – Appellant
Versus
Vinod Agrawal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
VIKRAM NATH, J.
1. The six appellants are the plaintiffs in a suit for specific performance of a contract. The Trial Court decreed the suit. However, the High Court, on first appeal, allowed the appeal, set aside the order of the Trial Court and dismissed the suit. Aggrieved, the present appeals by the plaintiffs.
2. The dispute relates to 23.98 acres of Khasra Nos.546, 547 and 548 situate in village Godar Mau, Tehsil Huzur, District Bhopal. It is an admitted position between the parties that a larger area measuring 27.56 acres of the aforesaid three khasra numbers was purchased by one Sushila Bai, wife of late Chandra Mal Aggarwal, vide registered sale deed dated 29.04.1966 executed by erstwhile owner Vijay Chhatti for a sale consideration of Rs.7,000/-. Based on the said instrument, the name of Sushila Bai was mutated in land revenue records.
3. The appellants filed separate suits for specific performance in May, 1995 against the legal heirs of Sushila Devi.
4. It would be relevant to mention here that in the plaint, defendant nos.1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 were the other legal heirs of late Sushila Devi. We have mentioned the name of Kailash Aggarwal separately as he had a distinct ro
MST. Kharbuja Kuer vs. Jangbahadur Rai & Ors
Krishna Mohan Kul vs Pratima Maity and Ors.
Thiruvengadam Pillai vs. Navaneethammal and Anr.
Vidyadhar Vishnupant Ratnaparkhi v. Manikrao Babarao Deshmukh and ors.
Janki Vashdeo Bhojwani & Anr. V. Indusind Bank Ltd. And Anr.
Man kaur vs. Hartar Singh Sangha
Thomson Press (India) Ltd. V. Nank Builders & Investors (P) Ltd.
(1) Agreement to sell – Suit for specific performance – Purchaser who has paid full consideration and received original title deeds from seller would have taken possession under normal circumstances ....
Agreement to Sell – If plaintiff, in a suit for specific performance is required to prove that he was always ready and willing to perform his part of contract, it is necessary for him to step into wi....
The court affirmed that specific performance is a discretionary remedy, requiring the plaintiff to prove the validity of the contract and readiness to perform.
The court held that specific performance of an agreement for sale is unenforceable without consent from co-parceners and proof of legal necessity, emphasizing the court's discretion in granting such ....
Agreement to Sell – Suit for Specific Performance – Once execution of agreement to sell and payment/receipt of advance substantial sale consideration is admitted by vendor, thereafter nothing further....
(1) Agreement to sell – Suit for Specific Performance – When decree has already been executed and substantive rights have accrued in favour of heirs of plaintiff, it would be inequitable to dislodge ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.