SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(SC) 1207

HRISHIKESH ROY, S. V. N. BHATTI
Pawapuri Rice Mills – Appellant
Versus
Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Navaniti Prasad Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Vaibhav Niti, AOR Ms. Madhavi Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Vijayraj Singh Chouhan, Adv. Mr. Jairaj Singh, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Mohan, Adv. Mr. Madhur Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Harish Pandey, AOR Mr. Sudhir Kumar Katriar, Sr. Adv. Ms. Rachita Rai, Adv. Mr. B S Rajesh Agrajit, Adv. Mr. Vinay Kumar Ojha, Adv. Mr. Samaresh Kumar Jha, Adv. Ms. Monika Sharma, Adv. Ms. Priya Nagar, Adv. Mr. Samadarshi Sanjay, Adv. Mr. Shyamal Kumar, AOR Mr. Siddharth Goswami, Adv. Ms. Jyoti Rana, Adv. Mr. Subodh Kr. Pathak, Adv. Mr. Vinod Kumar Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Shashi Ranjan, Adv. Mr. Aditya Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Pawan Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. R. Prashant Bhrigu, Adv. Mr. Akash Swami, Adv. Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Sinha, AOR Mr. Smarhar Singh, AOR Ms. Shweta Kumari, Adv. Mr. Vikas Chopra, Adv. Mr. Jai Krishna Singh, Adv. Mr. Gopal Jha, AOR Mr. Amit Sibal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rudreshwar Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sumeet Singh, Adv. Mr. Kaushik Poddar, AOR Mr. Gautam Singh, Adv. Ms. Isha Singh, Adv. Ms. Shatakshi Sahay, Adv. Mr. Mr Shivam Singh, Adv. Mr. Kumar Avinahs, Adv. Ms. Dipali Singh, Adv. Ms. Alka Singh, Adv. Mr. Abhiprav Singh, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Manish Kumar, AOR Mr. Divyansh Mishra, Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar, AOR Mr. Shagun Ruhil, Adv. Ms. Kusum Pandey, Adv. Mr. Karan Chopra, Adv. Mr. Gopal Singh, AOR

JUDGMENT :

S.V.N. BHATTI, J.

1. Common issues of fact and law arise in the instant batch of Appeals under the Bihar and Orissa Public Demands Recovery Act, 1914 (for short ‘the Act’) and the Bihar and Orissa Public Demands Recovery Rules (for short ‘the Rules’) hence, these Appeals are disposed of by this Judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

2. The appellants in Civil Appeal No. 1890 of 2023 and Civil Appeal No. 1889 of 2023 are rice millers in the State of Bihar. The first respondent in the Civil Appeals is the State of Bihar, and the fourth respondent is the Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation. For convenience, the appellants are referred to as ‘Rice Millers’ and the contesting respondents as the ‘State’ and ‘Civil Supplies Corporation’ respectively. The subject matter of the Appeals relates to the procurement of Custom Milled Rice (for short ‘CMR’) for the procurement year 2011-12 in the State of Bihar. The subject procurement policy departs from the previous policy of collecting levy rice from the Rice Millers. As is known from practice and scheme, levy rice is a system requiring millers to sell a percentage of their rice to the Government at a particular price. Under the levy ric

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top