SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.M. KHANWILKAR, ABHAY S. OKA, J.B. PARDIWALA, JJ.
Satinder Singh Bhasin – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. - Respondent(s)
Writ Petition(S)(Criminal) No(S). 197/2021 With W.P.(Crl.) No.292/2021, W.P.(Crl.) No. 452/2021, W.P.(Crl.) No. 518/2021, W.P.(Crl.) No. 59/2022, W.P.(Crl.) No. 91/2022, W.P.(Crl.) No.114/2022, W.P.(Crl.) No. 522/2021
Decided on : 12-05-2022.SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.M. KHANWILKAR, ABHAY S. OKA, J.B. PARDIWALA, JJ.
Satinder Singh Bhasin – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. - Respondent(s)
Writ Petition(S)(Criminal) No(S). 197/2021 With W.P.(Crl.) No.292/2021, W.P.(Crl.) No. 452/2021, W.P.(Crl.) No. 518/2021, W.P.(Crl.) No. 59/2022, W.P.(Crl.) No. 91/2022, W.P.(Crl.) No.114/2022, W.P.(Crl.) No. 522/2021
Decided on : 12-05-2022.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. reliefs sought regarding multiple firs (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. principal fir identified for consolidation (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. court's order on firs and investigation (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. partially allowed writ petitions concerning consolidation (Para 20) |
| 5. disposition of pending applications (Para 21) |
ORDER :
1. By way of these writ petitions, the petitioners have sought overlapping reliefs concerning Bike Bot Scheme. In Writ Petition (Crl.) No.197/2021, following reliefs have been claimed by the petitioner:
b) Grant bail to the Petitioner and direct his release from custody with respect to all the F.I.R.s emanating out of the Bike Bot Scheme registered within the jurisdiction of Uttar Pradesh, Delhi and at any other place without the knowledge of the Petitioner and/or,
c) Grant protection to the Petitioner in all the FIRs already lodged and in all the future FIRs with regard to Bike Bot Scheme, wherein the Petitioner will be arrayed as Accused, and/or,
d) In the alternative grant bail to the Petitioner on interim basis till such time that his bail applications pending before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad are finally adjudicated upon and decided by the High Court upon resumption of normal bail hearings and/or
e) any other Order this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the present case.
2. In Writ Petition (Crl.) No.292/2021, the petitioner has sought following reliefs:
B. Consolidate and club all the FIRs in regard to Bike Bot Scheme, wherein the petitioner has been arrayed and will be arrayed as accused; and;
C. Grant bail to the Petitioner and direct his release from custody with respect to FIR No.385/2019, dated 03.04.2019 (Annexure P-8) and FIR No.697/2019, dated 11.07.2019 (Annexure P-11) registered with P.S. Dadri, Gautam Budh Nagar, Noida, U.P., list of FIRs annexed as Annexure P 20 and other FIRs emanating out of the Bike Bot Scheme registered or to be registered within the jurisdiction of Uttar Pradesh and at any other place; and;
D. Quash all proceedings qua the Petitioner in FIR No.385/2019, dated 03.04.2019 (Annexure P-8) and FIR No.697/2019, dated 11.07.2019 (Annexure P-11) registered with P.S. Dadri, Gautam Budh Nagar, Noida, U.P., list of FIRs annexed as Annexure P-20 and other FIRs emanating from the Bike Bot Scheme already lodged in the state of Uttar Pradesh, except FIR No.866 of 2019, registered by PS Dadri, Gautam Budh Nagar and that all the FIRs so quashed be treated as section 162 Cr.P.C. statements and be merged with the lead investigation in FIR no.866 of 2019; and
E. Grant protection of no coercive action to the Petitioner in all the FIRs already lodged and in all the future FIRs with regard to Bike Bot Scheme, wherein the Petitioner will be arrayed as Accused, and;
F. Pending the adjudication of this Petition, stay all coercive action/arrest against the Petitioner in all the FIRs already lodged and in all the future FIRs with regard to Bike Bot Scheme, wherein the Petitioner will be arrayed as Accused;
G. Pass any other Order this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances in the present case.
3. In Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 452/2021, following reliefs have been claimed by the petitioner:
b) Grant bail to the Petitioner and direct his release
The court denied bail based on the serious nature of the charges, the applicant's criminal history, and his role as a beneficiary in a significant fraud scheme.
Point of Law : Even a single case, if fulfils the category of offences given under Section 2(b) (i) to (xv) of Act and is being committed by gang defined under Section 2 (b) or gangster defined under....
The court emphasized the specific nature of the offenses under different State enactments and recent judgments in declining to grant the relief sought by the petitioner under Article 32 of the Consti....
The court dismissed anticipatory bail petitions due to the serious nature of allegations against the petitioner, emphasizing the need for custodial interrogation and the risk of witness tampering.
Merely because three separate FIRs have been filed do not mean that they could not be clubbed together and one charge-sheet could not be filed.
Subsequent FIRs may be permissible if they relate to distinct incidents or reveal new findings, even if arising from the same transaction.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.