Back
A. S. BOPANNA, MANOJ MISRA
Adarsh C. B. – Appellant
Versus
Aswathy Sidharthan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. visitation rights granted by family court. (Para 1) |
| 2. child’s welfare is a primary concern. (Para 2) |
| 3. altered visitation arrangement for child. (Para 3) |
| 4. next court date set for review. (Para 4) |
ORDER :
2. In a matter of the present nature, it is needless to mention, as rightly observed by the High Court, the welfare of the child is also to be kept in view by the Court. However, at this stage we find that the repeated visitation rights in the Court premises, would also not be in the interest of the child as the environment during which the visitation rights are exercised, would also matter.
4. List the matter on 31.10.2023.
The Supreme Court ruled that the welfare of the child necessitates visitation rights in a suitable environment rather than a court setting.
The welfare of the child is paramount in custody disputes, necessitating a balance between parental rights and the child's safety during visitation.
The welfare of the child is paramount in custody and visitation decisions, and the court may modify visitation rights based on the child's comfort and the totality of circumstances.
Custody arrangements can be modified via mutual consent to enhance visitation rights of a parent.
The welfare of the child is paramount, requiring both parents to foster a loving relationship and avoid parental alienation.
Visitation rights cannot be unilaterally modified; the child's best interest must be prioritized, ensuring emotional bonds with both parents.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
