SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 3170

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Neena Bansal Krishna, JJ.
Ruchika Mazumdar – Appellant
Versus
Himanshu Mitra – Respondent
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 149 of 2020 & CM Appls. 31908-31909 of 2020
Decided On : 02-08-2023

Advocates appeared:
Ms. Sujata Kashyap, Advocate along with Appellant in person.
Nemo, for the Respondent.

The welfare of the child is paramount in custody and visitation decisions, and the court may modify visitation rights based on the child's comfort and the totality of circumstances.

Headnote:

Custody - Family Law - The court granted visitation rights to the father on every Saturday, initially from 10:00 AM to 3:00 PM, which was later extended to 10:00 AM to 5:00 PM and then to 10:00 AM to 7:00 PM. The court emphasized the welfare of the child and modified the visitation rights based on the child's comfort and the totality of circumstances.

Fact of the Case:

The parties got married in 2015, had a child, and started living separately in 2017. The mother had custody of the child, and the father was granted visitation rights on Saturdays, initially from 10:00 AM to 3:00 PM, which was later extended.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the interim visitation arrangement was working well without any issues, and the child was comfortable with the father. It modified the visitation rights to ensure the welfare of the child.

Issues: The appeal sought to quash the orders granting visitation rights to the father and stay the proceedings before the trial court. The court also directed the trial court to consider granting overnight or increased visitations after interacting with the child.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the welfare of the child and considered the totality of circumstances in modifying the visitation rights. It directed the trial court to decide on increased visitations after interacting with the child.

Final Decision: The appeal was disposed of with a direction to the trial court to decide on increased visitations after interacting with the child. Pending applications were disposed of as infructuous.

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The present appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act has been filed by the appellant seeking setting aside of orders dated 16.09.2020 and 06.11.2020 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Courts, New Delhi in HMA No. 1821/2019, titled as Ruchika Mazumdar Vs. Himanshu Mitra."

2. Pertinently, the parties got married on 30.03.2015 and a child, namely, Master Abhirup, was born from this wedlock. The parties have been living separately since September, 2017 and the child has been in the custody of appellant-mother. The learned Principal Judge, Family Court vide order dated 16.09.2020 granted custody of the child to the respondent-father for every Saturday and Sunday. Aggrieved against the order dated 16.09.2020, the appellant filed an application seeking revocation of the same, which was dismissed by the learned trial court holding "there is no apparent error on the face of the record neither the order can be revocated or suspended or varied".

3. Being aggrieved, the appellant-mother knocked the door of this Court by filing the present appeal seeking quashing of the impugned orders and stay of proceedings before the learned trial court.

4. This Court after extensively hearing learned counsel for the parties vide order dated 08.12.2020 passed the following interim directions:

    "5. After interacting with learned counsel for the parties not only in respect of the dispute, subject matter of the present appeal but also on other disputes pending between the parties including the divorce petition filed by the appellant against the respondent and both parties have agreed to break the ice, it is agreed that the initial visitation rights in respect of the child be confined to half a day on every Saturday. Accordingly, till further orders, it is directed that the respondent shall pick up the child from the residence of the appellant at Dwarka at 10 A.M. on every Saturday and take the child to his residence at C.R. Park. He shall not take the child out of his residential premises due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The respondent and his parents shall spend time with the child, who shall be brought back to the appellant's resident by 3 P.M. on the same day. For the appellant to ensure that the child is comfortable with the respondent and his family members during the visitations, the respondent shall arrange a video call between her and the child at around 12 P.M."

5. The aforesaid order dated 08.12.2020 was further modified by this Court vide order dated 03.03.2021, holding as under:

    "Vide order dated 08.12.2020 the respondent was granted visitation rights; whereby he was permitted to pick up the child from the residence of the appellant at Dwarka at 10 A.M. on every Saturday and take him to his residence at C.R. Park, the child was to be dropped back by 3 P.M. on the same day at Dwarka. Considering the significant distance between Dwarka and C.R Park, as also the time taken for commuting, we are inclined to extend the time period from 10 am- 3 pm, to 10 am-5 pm. The other terms and conditions of the said order shall continue to operate. Interim orders to continue."

6. Evidently, this Court vide aforesaid order dated 03.03.2021 the respondent-father was granted visitation rights on every Saturday from 10:00 AM till 05:00 PM.

7. Today, we have interacted with the parties in chamber. It is not disputed that the respondent-father has been meeting the child as per interim arrangement directed vide order dated 03.03.2021. As per the submissions of the parties, this arrangement is working well without any hiccups considering the totality of circumstances and that the child is comfortable with the father on his weekly visits. It is considered in the interest and welfare of the child that he continues with the day visitations. However, the order dated 03.03.2021 is modified to the extent that respondent-father shall now have visitation right to meet

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top