SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(SC) 1280

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
DHANANJAYA Y. CHANDRACHUD, CJI, J.B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA, JJ.
Public Political Party – Petitioner
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 90 of 2024
Decided On : 12-02-2024

Important Points

The title of Deputy Chief Minister does not violate constitutional provisions regarding ministerial appointments.

Subject

Constitutional Law - Public Administration

Act Referred

Headnote

(A) Constitution of India - Article 32 - Challenge to the appointment of Deputy Chief Ministers - The petitioner contends that the office of Deputy Chief Minister is not stipulated in the Constitution, asserting that a Deputy Chief Minister is essentially a Minister who must be a Member of the legislature within a stipulated period. The Court finds the challenge lacks substance and dismisses the petition. (Paras 1 and 2)

Legal Category Hierarchy

  • constitutional law
    • state executive
      • appointment of ministers (Para 1)

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mohan Lal Sharma, Dinesh S. Badiar, Madhu Sudan Singh, Ravi Kumar Tomar

Table of Contents

1. Challenge under Article 32 of the Constitution to the appointment of Deputy Chief Ministers in the States. (Para 1 )

2. Submission that the office of Deputy Chief Minister is not stipulated in the Constitution. (Para 1 )

3. A Deputy Chief Minister is primarily a Minister, and the title does not violate the constitutional requirement for Ministers to be members of the legislature. (Para 1 )

4. The designation of Deputy Chief Minister is constitutionally permissible provided the appointee qualifies as a Minister by being a member of the legislature within the stipulated period. (Para 1 )

5. Petition dismissed. (Para 2 )

6. Does the appointment of a Deputy Chief Minister violate the Constitution if the office is not explicitly stipulated?

No, because a Deputy Chief Minister is primarily a Minister, and the title does not breach the constitutional requirement that a Minister must be a member of the legislature within a stipulated period. (Para 1 )

7. What is the constitutional status of a person appointed as a Deputy Chief Minister?

A Deputy Chief Minister is, first and foremost, a Minister in the Government of the State. (Para 1 )

ORDER :

1. The petitioner invokes the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution to challenge the appointment of the Deputy Chief Ministers in the States. His submission is that no such office is stipulated in the Constitution. A Deputy Chief Minister is, first and foremost, a Minister in the Government of the State. The appellation of a Deputy Chief Minister does not breach the constitutional position, namely, that a person who holds office of a Minister must, in any event, within a stipulated period, be the Member of the legislature in order to qualify for appointment as a Minister.

2. In that view of the matter, the challenge which is being addressed before this Court lacks in substance. The petition is accordingly dismissed.

3. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top