SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(SC) 1765

DINESH MAHESHWARI, HRISHIKESH ROY
Central Bureau of Investigation – Appellant
Versus
Deshraj Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr.Sanjay Jain, ASG, Ms.Ashima Gupta, Mr.Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Mr.Kumar Parimal, Mr.Anukalp Jain, Mr.Adit Khorana, Mr.Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR
For the Respondent:Mr.J.M.Sharma, Sr.Advocate, Mr.Nitin Singh, Mr.Ankur Yadav, AOR, Mr.Aakash Kumar, Mr.Ardhendumuli Kumar Prasad, AAG, Mr.Sarvesh Singh Baghel, AOR, Ms.Ishani Sharma, Mr.Shantwanu Singh, AOR

Table of Content
1. hearing and review of materials (Para 1)
2. court's reluctance to interfere with investigative transfer (Para 2)
3. decision on petition and expectations for cbi (Para 3 , 4 , 5)

ORDER :

1. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and have perused the material placed on record.

3. The petition, seeking special leave to appeal is, therefore, dismissed.

5. The entire record shall be transmitted by the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 to the petitioner-CBI within a week from today.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top