SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 206

DIPANKAR DATTA, MANMOHAN
Monika – Appellant
Versus
Nanda Gopal MD – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: S. Thananjayan, Promila, Deepak Reddy, Avinish K Saurab

ORDER :

1. Read the office report dated 08th January, 2025. Service has been duly effected.

2. The marriage between the petitioner, Monika, and the respondent, Nanda Gopal MD, was solemnized on 27th March, 2024 at Thirumala Devasthanam at Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh. No child is born to them from such wedlock. However, the spouses have since drifted apart owing to differences arising by and between them.

3. The respondent instituted proceedings under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 bearing M.C. No. 3086 of 2024 titled Nanda Gopal MD vs. Monika before the court of the Principal Family Judge, Bangalore, Karnataka.

4. On the multiple grounds urged in the petition, the petitioner has sought for transfer of the aforesaid proceedings from the court of the Principal Family Judge, Bangalore, Karnataka to the court of the Family Judge at Puducherry.

5. The respondent has neither entered appearance nor has he filed any counter affidavit dealing with the statements/averments made in the transfer petition. We are, thus, inclined to the view that the respondent has no serious objection to grant of the prayer for transfer.

6. We are also otherwise satisfied, having regard to the inconvenience t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top