IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
MADAN GOPAL VYAS, J.
Nisha Rajpurohit W/o Shailendra Kumar – Petitioner
Versus
Shailendra Kumar S/o Rajendra Singh Rajpurohit – Respondent
S.B. Civil Transfer Application No. 2 of 2023
Decided On : 15-09-2023
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Section 24 - Hindu Marriage Act 1955 - Section 9, 13(1) - Transfer petition - Matrimonial proceedings - Transfer petition has been preferred by petitioner-wife for transferring Case preferred by respondent from court of Addl. District Judge No. 1, Barmer to Family Court, Bikaner – Held, Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Vinisha Jitesh Tolani @ Manmeet Laghmani vs. Jitesh Kishore Tolani, has observed that in matrimonial proceedings initiated by husband against wife convenience of wife has to be considered for contesting suit, and accordingly matrimonial proceedings ought to be transferred where wife is residing - Court deems it appropriate to transfer petition under Section 9 of Hindu Marriage Act from court of Addl. District Judge No. 1, Barmer to Family Court, Bikaner - Petition is allowed.
JUDGMENT :
MADAN GOPAL VYAS, J.
1. The present transfer petition under Section 24 of CPC has been preferred by the petitioner-wife for transferring the Case No. 217/2022 preferred by the respondent herein under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955, from the court of Addl. District Judge No. 1, Barmer to Family Court, Bikaner.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the application under Section 13(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act preferred by the petitioner is pending before the Family Court, Bikaner. Thus it is prayed that application under Section 9 of Hindu Marriage Act may also be transferred to Family Court, Bikaner
3. Learned counsel appearing for respondent opposed the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. It is submitted that the petitioner is a government teacher and is discharging her duties at Government Secondary School, Solankiyon Ki Dhani, Mahabar, Tehsil and District Barmer and therefore, the application under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act may not be transferred from Barmer to Bikaner as at present she is residing at Barmer.
4. In rejoinder, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner is now transferred to Barmer but she is having threat perception at Barmer. It is submitted that an application under Section 13(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act is pending consideration at Bikaner, therefore, the application under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act too may be transferred to Bikaner.
5. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Vinisha Jitesh Tolani @ Manmeet Laghmani vs. Jitesh Kishore Tolani, 2010 (1) WLC (SC) 705 has observed that in the matrimonial proceedings initiated by the husband against the wife the convenience of the wife has to be considered for contesting the suit, and accordingly the matrimonial proceedings ought to be transferred where the wife is residing.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems it appropriate to transfer the petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act from the court of Addl. District Judge No. 1, Barmer to the Family Court, Bikaner.
7. The transfer petition is allowed accordingly.
8. It is ordered that the Civil Case No. 217/2022 under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955, pending before the court of Addl. District Judge No. 1, Barmer be transferred to the Family Court, Bikaner.
9. The learned Addl. District Judge No. 1, Barmer is directed to send the record of the case to Family Court, Bikaner.
10. Both the parties are directed to appear before Family Court, Bikaner on 9.10.2023.
11. Learned Family Court, Bikaner is directed to expedite the trial of the case.
In matrimonial proceedings initiated by the husband against the wife, the convenience of the wife must be considered for contesting the suit, and the court may transfer the proceedings accordingly.
The main legal point established is that in transfer applications under Section 24 CPC, the court will consider the balance of convenience and the interest of justice, taking into account the parties....
The court established that the balance of convenience and the potential hardship to the petitioner justified the transfer of the case under the Hindu Marriage Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.