SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
VIKRAM NATH, PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ.
Rakesh Kumar Charmakar & Ors. – Appellants
VERSUS
The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. – Respondent
Civil Appeal Nos. 1303-1304 of 2025 (SLP (C) NOS. 8613-8614 of 2022)
Decided On : 31-01-2025
Civil Services -- regularisation -- Class III and Class IV part-time employees -- M. P. Veterinary Department Contingency Paid Employees Recruitment and Conditions of Service Rules, 1979 -- Circular No. 192/601/1/S.R.D./84 dated 10.5.1984 -- Cl. 6 -- appellants appointed as part-time sweepers under Special Recruitment Drive -- appointments were on sanctioned and vacant posts although on temporary basis -- held -- they are covered under Cl. 6 of Circular since they have completed three years after being employed as 'temporary' employees on wages prescribed by Collector, with recommendation of District Level Recruitment Committee -- they fulfil all conditions stipulated in Circular to grant revised pay-scale -- their designation as 'part-time' sweepers does not affect validity of their appointment since they were appointed against sanctioned posts -- they were appointed on regular posts even though they were temporary -- they are entitled for regular pay-scale -- additionally, Circular dated 7.10.2016 extended benefit of regular pay-scale to daily wagers -- it would be unjust, unfair and arbitrary if such benefit is not extended to appellants. W. P. No. 10434 of 2018 decided on 12.7.2019 affirmed. Writ Appeal No. 1486 of 2019 decided on 2.12.2019 set aside. Ram Naresh Writ Appeal No. 197 of 2016 discussed. [Paras 13 to 16
JUDGMENT
VIKRAM NATH, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. These appeals assail the judgement passed by Division Bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court on 02.12.2019 in Writ Appeal No.1486/19 whereby it allowed the appeal filed by Respondent (State of Madhya Pradesh) and held that Appellants are not eligible to get regular pay scale as per circular dated 10.05.1984. Further, the Division Bench distinguished their case from that of Ram Naresh Prajapati & Ors vs State of M.P., Writ Appeal No.197 of 2016 and denied extending the benefit of regular pay-scale to Appellants on the ground of similar facts. The appeal also assails the order passed by Division Bench on 10.12.2021 in Review Petition No. 90/2020 whereby it dismissed the review filed by the appellants.
3. The brief facts leading to present appeal are summarised as follows:
3.1 On 11.06.1980, in exercise of powers under proviso of Article 309 of the Constitution of India, the Respondent State framed the rules titled “M.P. Veterinary Department Contingency Paid Employees Recruitment & Conditions of Service Rules, 1979” (“1979 Rules”). The M.P. General Administration department issued a circular dated 10.05.1984 (No.192/601/1/S.R.D./84) in reference to recruitment of employees getting salaries from work- charged/contingency fund and in reference to giving them revised pay-scale. Clause 6 of the Circular reads as:
3.2 It also stated that employees of this service could be recruited by a Selection Committee at district level. Effectively, the circular conferred the benefit of revised pay-scale to employees completing three years after initially being recruited by the Selection Committee at district level and appointed by Collector as temporary employees on fixed wages.
3.3 Additionally, the circular stated that members who did not receive status of permanent employees by 01.04.1982, would receive status of temporary employee, if they hold prescribed educational qualification and necessary eligibilities, they should also be conferred the benefit of revised pay-scale. This helps to clarify the purpose of the Circular as the State is making provision for temporary employees to avail the benefit of regular pay-scale.
3.4 In 1996, the State of MP initiated a Special Recruitment Drive to fill up Class III and Class IV posts lying vacant in various departments, which were reserved for candidates from Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes. A Selection Committee was constituted. Appellant No.6 Ramesh Prasad Prajapati was appointed by order dated 09.12.1996 under the special recruitment drive, issued by the Deputy Director, Veterinary Hospital as per the selection list sent by the office of Collector. The order stated that Appellant No.6 along with four others was appointed temporarily on daily wage rate prescribed by Collector.
3.5 On 14.09.1998, MP General Administration department issued a circular stating that candidates appointed on regular posts under the Special Recruitment Drive would be paid regular pay-scale of the concerned post.
3.6 Since certain posts were still lying vacant, on 30.07.2005, the MP General Administration Department extended the time limit of Special Recruitment Drive for filling up the backlog posts of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes, from 31.07.2005 to 31.12.2005. Earlier, two memorandums were issued on 19.02.2002 and 24.03.2005 elaborating the guidelines for recruitment.
3.7 By the order of the Deputy Director, Veterinary Services, Umaria dated 03.12.2005, a Selecti
Article 38(1) enjoins the State to strive to promote welfare of the people by securing and protecting as effective as it may a social order in which justice - social, economic and political shall inf....
Point of Law : Principle of “equal pay for equal work” has also been extended to temporary employees (differently described as work-charge, daily wage, casual, ad hoc, contractual, and the like)
The main legal point established in the judgment is the principle of 'equal pay for equal work' and the applicability of the Circular to part-time employees working for less than four hours.
Point of law: Doctrine of equal pay for equal work, as adumbrated under Article 39(d) of the Constitution of India read with Article 14 thereof, cannot be applied in a vacuum. The constitutional sche....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the respondent authorities must comply with the relevant circulars issued by the State Government in granting regular pay scale to employees a....
The court upheld that fixed pay contingency employees do not qualify for regularization under work-charged employee policies, emphasizing the need for adherence to established criteria.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.