Back
VIKRAM NATH, SANJAY KAROL, SANDEEP MEHTA
Sajimon Parayil – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the hema committee (Para 3) |
| 2. sit's investigation and actions (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. petitioners' grievances (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. legal obligations of police (Para 15 , 16) |
| 5. disposal of petitions (Para 17 , 18) |
ORDER :
1. Permission to file SLP is granted in SLP (C) D. No. 55412 of 2024.
3. Before proceeding further to consider the submissions made, brief background of the facts giving rise to the present petitions is as follows:
It is the contents of paragraph 5 by which the petitioners are majorly aggrieved.
5. The petitioner in SLP (C) Nos. 27320-27321 of 2024, namely Juli CJ, is said to be a witness and that she is being pressurised to give statement. It is also her case that despite her denial to lodge any complaint or to give any statement before the SIT, an FIR has apparently been registered. Further, the petitioner in Diary No. 55412 of 2024, namely Parvathi T. is an actress and is facing similar harassment and pressure at the instance of the SIT, much against her wishes.
7. Mr. Basant, learned senior counsel appearing for the film producer has submitted that the impugned order is contrary to the settled legal position as such,
The court affirmed the necessity of respecting privacy rights during investigations and clarified that witnesses cannot be compelled to testify, allowing for grievances to be addressed by the High Co....
The court upheld the State Information Commission's order, emphasizing the balance between public interest in information disclosure and the protection of individual privacy under the RTI Act.
The court upheld the State Information Commission's order to disclose parts of the Justice K. Hema Committee Report, emphasizing public interest over privacy concerns under the RTI Act.
The court's decision emphasized the need for an impartial inquiry, victim and witness protection, and infrastructure improvements in response to the reported incidents in Sandeshkhali.
The court upheld the protection of press freedom and privacy rights, emphasizing that investigative procedures must respect journalistic integrity and not result in harassment of reporters.
Once the matter was in seisin of the High Court, nothing could and ought to have been undertaken without its express leave.
Black money transaction - seeking investigation - Orders have been issued by Deputy Inspector General of Police without ascertaining factual details, Petitioner has not made any verification about co....
A person who participates in the enquiry proceedings without objection cannot challenge the constitution of the Committee after the result goes against them, and may not have an alternative efficacio....
(1) Sectarian violence and strife in Manipur – Clashes between Kuki and Meitei Communities – Victims of violence must receive remedial measures irrespective of their community – There is a pressing n....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
