SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 1960

M. R. SHAH, B. V. NAGARATHNA
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Bangalore – Appellant
Versus
Wipro Limited – Respondent


Table of Content
1. revenue challenges high court judgment. (Para 1)
2. background on exemption and loss claim. (Para 2)
3. revenue's arguments against exemption claim. (Para 3)
4. assessee's counter-arguments. (Para 4)
5. court's final interpretation of section 10b. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)

JUDGMENT :

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 30.11.2020 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru in Income Tax Appeal No. 462/2017, by which the High Court has dismissed the said appeal preferred by the Revenue and has confirmed the judgment and order dated 25.11.2016 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench ‘C’, Bangalore (for short, ‘ITAT’), allowing the assessee’s claim for carry forward of losses under Section 72 of the INCOME TAX ACT , 1961 (for short, ‘IT Act’), the Revenue has preferred the present appeal.

2.1 Assessing Officer passed an order dated 31.03.2004 rejecting the withdrawal of exemption under Section 10(b) of the IT Act holding that the assessee did not furnish the declaration in writing before the due date of filing of return of income, which was 31.10.2001. Thereby, the AO made

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top