SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 591

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.R. GAVAI, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, JJ.
Kousik Das and Others – Appellants
Versus
State of West Bengal and Others – Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 4963 of 2025 [Arising Out of SLP (C) No. 19139 of 2024]
Decided On : 04-04-2025

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Gopal Sankaranarayanan,Sr.Adv. Mr. Suryodaya Prakash Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Singh, AOR Mrs. Shachi Pandey, Adv. Ms. Vibha Datta Makhija,Sr.Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar,AOR. Mr. Praveen Gaur,Adv.
For the Respondent(s)/ Applicant(s): Mr. Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Kunal Chatterji, AOR Ms. Maitrayee Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Rohit Bansal, Adv. Mr. Gagan Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Abhinay, AOR Ms. Deeksha Prakash, Adv. Ms. Kirti Vyas, Adv. Mr. Biswajit Deb, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anando Mukherjee, AOR Mr. Shwetank Singh, Adv. Ms. Shalini Chandra, AOR Mr. Arun Kumar, Adv. Mr. Abhinav Kumar, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR Mr. Amit Thorat,Adv. Mr. Dibyadyuti Banerjee, Adv. Ms. Sumedha Halder, Adv. Mr. Abhijit Sengupta, AOR Mr. Paras Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Suryodaya Prakash Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Devendra Kumar Shukla, AOR Ms. Shachi Pandey, Adv.

The 18 months D. El. Ed. qualification through NIOS is valid for in-service teachers employed as of 10th August 2017, contrary to the High Court's ruling.

Headnote:(A) Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 - Section 23 - NCTE (Recognition, Norms and Procedure) Regulations, 2014 - The appellants, having completed an 18 months D. El. Ed. programme through NIOS, challenged the High Court's decision to bar their recruitment as Assistant Teachers based on the duration of their qualification. The court found that the 18 months D. El. Ed. was valid for in-service teachers employed as of 10th August 2017, and the High Court erred in equating it with a 2 years qualification. (Paras 4.1, 4.9, 11, 40-41, 40-41)

(B) Education - Teacher Qualifications - The court clarified that the NCTE's recognition order aimed to provide a one-time opportunity for in-service teachers to acquire necessary qualifications, and those who completed the 18 months course before the deadline are valid diploma holders. (Paras 26-28, 40)

(C) Appeal - The appeal was allowed, quashing the High Court's orders and affirming the validity of the 18 months D. El. Ed. for eligible teachers. (Paras 40-41)

Facts of the case:
The appellants completed an 18 months D. El. Ed. programme through NIOS as per NCTE's recognition order, but faced challenges in recruitment due to a High Court ruling that deemed their qualification inferior to a 2 years D. El. Ed. (Paras 4.5, 4.9)

Findings of Court:
The court found that the High Court's ruling was erroneous and upheld the validity of the 18 months D. El. Ed. for in-service teachers who completed it before the deadline. (Paras 40-41)

Issues: The main issue was whether the 18 months D. El. Ed. through NIOS is equivalent to the 2 years qualification for recruitment purposes. (Paras 11, 40)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the NCTE's recognition order was intended to assist in-service teachers and that the 18 months D. El. Ed. is valid for those who were employed as of 10th August 2017. (Paras 26-28, 40)

Result: The appeal is allowed; the High Court's judgments are quashed, and the Writ Petition is dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

B.R. GAVAI, J.

1. Interlocutory Applications No. 214706/2024, 2138/2025, 11267/2025, 11487/2025, 14658/2025, 20935/2025 and 40978/2025 are allowed.

2. Leave granted.

3. The appellants take exception to the final judgment and order dated 24th July 2024 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court at Calcutta in MAT 817 of 2024, whereby the Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the intra-court appeal filed by some of the appellants before this Court thereby affirming the judgment and order dated 29th February 2024 passed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court in W.P.A. No. 16118 of 2023.

4. The facts, in brief, giving rise to the present appeal are as under:

    4.1 The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (hereinafter “RTE Act”) came into force on 1st April 2010. Section 23 of the RTE Act is concerned with the qualifications for appointment and terms and conditions of service of teachers. It is to be noted that sub-section (1) of Section 23 of the RTE Act provides that any person possessing such minimum qualifications, as laid down by an academic authority, authorised by the Central Government, by notification, shall be eligible for appointment as a teacher. Pursuant thereto the Central Government has, by a Gazette Notification, authorized the National Council for Teacher Education (hereinafter “NCTE”) as the academic authority.

    4.2 On 28th November 2014, the NCTE, in super-session of the previous regulations, prescribed the NCTE (Recognition, Norms and Procedure) Regulations, 2014 (hereinafter, “2014 NCTE Regulations”).

    4.3 On 3rd August 2017, the Central Government through Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD), by way of a letter addressed to the Principal Secretary/Secretary Education of all States and Union Territories (UTs) apprised them that in terms of Section 23 of the RTE Act, the in-service untrained elementary teachers in the Government/Government Aided/Unaided-Private Schools are required to be trained. It was further informed that the period for such training is being extended to 31st March 2019 by way of an amendment to the RTE Act and that this will be the last chance to acquire the requisite minimum qualifications and that any untrained teacher would not be allowed to continue in-service beyond 1st April 2019. Thereafter, on 10th August 2017 the amendment to the RTE Act (Act No. 24 of 2017) was notified by way of a Gazette Notification.

    4.4 On 22nd September 2017, the NCTE, after considering the recommendations of an Expert Committee, granted relaxation to certain provisions of the 2014 NCTE Regulations for ensuring compliance with the directions of the Central Government in terms of the letter dated 3rd August 2017. It is to be noted that the duration of the Diploma in Elementary Education (hereinafter “D.El.Ed.”) programme was reduced to 18 months instead of 2 years by including/subsuming the 6 months internship within the 18 months. It is further to be noted that the NCTE granted recognition/approval to National Institute of Open Schooling (hereinafter, “NIOS”) for conducting the 18 months D.El.Ed. programme through Online Distance Learning (hereinafter “ODL”) mode via the SWAYAM Portal of MHRD for training of such of the in-service untrained teachers by 31st March 2019.

    4.5 It appears that the appellants, in terms of the aforesaid recognition order, completed their 18 months D.El.Ed. programme through NIOS.

    4.6 On 29th September 2022, the West Bengal Board of Primary Education (hereinafter “WBBPE”) issued a notification for recruitment of qualified trained candidates to the posts of Assistant Teachers in Government Aided/Government Sponsored/Junior Basic Primary Schools.

    4.7 On 6th July 2023, a set of candidates desirous of recruitment to the post of Assistant Teachers in terms of the notification dated 29th September 2022 filed a Writ Petition before the High Court at Calcutta. It was their specific averment that D.El.Ed. is a course of 2 years and that any candidate who

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top