SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 734

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Vikram Nath, Sanjay Karol, Sandeep Mehta, JJ.
Arathy Ramachandran – Appellant
Versus
Bijay Raj Menon – Respondent
Civil Appeal No(s). 5680 of 2025 (Arising out of SLP (Civil) No(s). 31099 of 2024)
Decided On : 29-04-2025

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Ms. Haripriya Padmanabhan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Santosh Krishnan, AOR Ms. Sonam Anand, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Dr. Rajesh Kumar Pandey, Sr. Adv. Ms. Aswathi M.k., AOR

The paramount consideration in child custody cases is the welfare of the child, not merely parental affection, necessitating a conducive environment for their emotional and physical well-being.

Headnote:(A) Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 - Child custody - The court emphasized that the paramount consideration in custody matters is the welfare of the child, not merely the affection of parents - The High Court's order granting 15 days' interim custody to the father was deemed unsustainable due to concerns over the child's well-being and environment - The mother raised valid concerns regarding the father's adherence to conditions set by the High Court, particularly regarding the provision of home-cooked meals and companionship for the child - The court ultimately directed a revised interim custody arrangement to ensure the children's welfare. (Paras 19, 20, 26, 29, 32)

Facts of the case:
The appellant-mother and respondent-father, both professionals, faced marital discord and sought custody of their two children following separation. The Family Court initially granted custody to the mother, but the High Court later modified this arrangement, granting interim custody to the father.

Findings of Court:
The High Court's order was reversed, and a new interim custody arrangement was established to prioritize the children's welfare.

Issues: The main issues included the adequacy of the father's living conditions for the children and the impact of the custody arrangement on their emotional and physical well-being.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the welfare of the child is the primary consideration in custody disputes, and the previous arrangement was not conducive to the children's well-being.

Result: The appeal is allowed, and the High Court's order is reversed.

Judgement Key Points

Key Points: - The paramount consideration in child custody is the welfare of the child, not parental affection. (!) - The High Court’s 15-days-per-month interim custody to the father was found unsustainable due to concerns about the child’s environment and welfare, including lack of home-cooked meals and lack of company. (!) (!) (!) - The Court directed a revised interim custody arrangement: daughter to have alternate weekend custody with the father; four-hour interim custody for the son on one of those days, supervised by a child counsellor; video calls and home-cooked meals to be provided; parental counselling. (!) (!) - The Court interacted with the child in camera and noted the child’s preference and welfare concerns, including emotional well-being under the prior arrangement. (!) (!) - The High Court’s interim order was reversed; Family Court to expedite permanent guardianship proceedings. (!) (!) - The respondent-father’s access includes two supervised or semi-supervised arrangements and counseling, while ensuring the child’s health and nutrition. (!) (!)

What is the welfare of the child standard in custody disputes as applied by the Supreme Court in this case?

What is the appropriate interim custody arrangement to balance both parents' rights and the child’s welfare?

What factors justify setting aside the High Court's interim custody order and directing new interim arrangements with supervision and home-cooked meals?


JUDGMENT :

Mehta, J.

1. Heard.

2. Leave granted.

3. The appellant1[Hereinafter, being referred to as ‘appellant-mother’] and the respondent2[Hereinafter, being referred to as ‘respondent-father’], who are both highly qualified professionals, tied the knot in the year 2014. From their wedlock, two children were born-the first being the daughter, on 23.07.2016, and the second being the son, on 05.07.2022. The custody of the children is the subject matter of the present lis.

4. We are informed that at present, the appellant- mother is employed in an IT company which allows her to work from home. The respondent-father is reportedly, working as a General Manager in a construction company at Singapore. It seems that the spouses faced marital discord in the year 2017 and accordingly, both started living separately with occasional attempts at restoring the matrimonial ties. In one of these attempts at reconciliation in the year 2021, the appellant again conceived and gave birth to the son, who is presently about three years of age.

5. The appellant-mother felt a threat perception that the respondent-father may try to forcibly remove the children from her custody. Thus, in June, 2024, she filed an original petition, bearing O.P. (G&W) No. 1185 of 2024, seeking permanent custody of the children under the provisions of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 in the Family Court, Thiruvananthapuram3[Hereinafter, being referred to as ‘Family Court’]. The said proceedings are still pending final adjudication.

6. The Family Court passed an order dated 7th June, 2024, restraining the respondent-father from forcibly removing the minor children from the custody of the appellant-mother.

7. On 22nd July, 2024, the respondent-father filed an application, bearing I.A. No. 02 of 2024, seeking interim custody/visitation rights of the children in the custody proceedings instituted by the appellant-mother. The Family Court vide order dated 7th October, 2024, granted visitation rights to the respondent-father, permitting him to visit and interact with the children from 10:00 a.m. to 01:30 p.m. on the second Saturday of every month at the Court premises. The respondent- father was also permitted to interact with the children via video calls from 07:00 p.m. to 07:20 p.m. (IST) on all Saturdays except second Saturday.

8. On 4th November, 2024, the respondent-father preferred an Original Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, bearing OP (FC) No. 682 of 2024, assailing the order dated 7th October, 2024 before the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam4[Hereinafter, being referred to as the ‘High Court’]. The said petition came to be decided by the Division Bench of the High Court vide order dated 11th December, 2024, providing interim custody of the children to the respondent-father on the terms indicated below: -

    “8. Considering the fact that the father also needs the custody of the children to have bonding with them till they attain the age of 18 years, we would not keep the father away from the interim custody of the children, as the children require the care and custody of both the spouses/ parents. Accordingly, we grant fifteen (15) days of custody to each in a month till the disposal of the O.P pertaining to permanent custody with the following conditions:

    1. Husband shall file an undertaking regarding taking of the flat on rent bearing No.5A SFS, City space, Thiruvananthapuram, which is fully furnished as well and with regard to the engagement of a Nanny within a period of one week from today.

    2. He will also make arrangement of the vehicle for commutation of the children for drop on and drop off ie., to and from the flat and the school or another place.

    3. He will not take the children away to Thrissur. He is at liberty to bring his mother to Thiruvananthapuram without the permission of this court.

    4. He will ensure that the children are taken care healthy and congenial environment and there is no lacking in it.

    9. We have been informed that every year there

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top