SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Ahsanuddin Amanullah, S.V.N. Bhatti, JJ.
Nainsi Gupta – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. – Respondents
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).30365 of 2024
Decided On : 02-06-2025
ORDER :
The present petition has been filed by the petitioner who is the wife of respondent no.2 and mother of a minor child who is presently residing with the father-respondent no.2.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had filed an application for interim custody of the child, in a case of custody filed by respondent no.2 before the trial court, which is pending and by way of an interim arrangement, the petitioner was allowed to meet her son twice a month on every first and third Saturday between 11:00 a.m. to 03:00 p.m. at the Mediation Centre of the court.
3. Being aggrieved, the petitioner had moved before the High Court and the High Court vide impugned order dated 11.11.2024 had modified the visiting time from twice a month to once in a week between 11:00 a.m. to 04:00 p.m. and also directed trial court to conclude the application for interim custody within a period of two months. But inspite of High Court’s direction to conclude the matter within a period of two months, application is still lying pending. Being aggrieved, the petitioner has moved before this Court.
4. However, it is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that the Court may direct the trial court to finally decide the application of interim custody of the child filed by the petitioner within a short period and in the meantime, more visitation rights be granted so that, the child can at least be brought to a mental framework where he has to be weaned out of the influence of the father under whose custody he is presently living.
5. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the main petition itself is still pending before the trial court and thus, the reason for moving before this Court does not appear to be bonafide.
6. Be that as it may, for the ends of justice and having considered the matter in its entirety, we are inclined to pass the following orders:-
(ii) As we have been informed that both the parties reside in the same city, respondent no.2 is directed to take the child to the residence of petitioner-mother at 11:00 a.m. on every Friday and then, take back the child on Sunday at 06:00 p.m. The arrangement shall continue till the application for interim custody is finally decided by the trial court within the time period fixed above i.e., two months from today.
7. We make it clear that neither we have expressed any opinion nor we have gone into the merits of the matter.
8. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of in the aforementioned terms.
9. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
Timely resolution of custody matters is essential for the child's welfare, and interim visitation rights should be granted to ensure the child's mental well-being.
The paramount consideration in child custody cases is the welfare of the child, not merely parental affection, necessitating a conducive environment for their emotional and physical well-being.
The welfare of the child is paramount in custody disputes, necessitating a balance between parental rights and the child's safety during visitation.
The court emphasized that a biological parent's visitation rights should not be denied based on unproven allegations, prioritizing the children's welfare.
Family Court's interlocutory orders regarding visitation are not appealable under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, especially when subsequent events alter the initial conditions significantly.
The welfare of the child is paramount in custody and visitation decisions, and the court may modify visitation rights based on the child's comfort and the totality of circumstances.
The best interest of the child and the impact of frequent changes on the child's well-being are central legal principles established in the judgment.
Children's welfare must guide custody decisions, with equal emphasis on parents' visitation rights.
Custody orders are interim and must adapt to the evolving interests of the child, emphasizing the paramount importance of the child's welfare in family law matters.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.