ORDER :

The present petition has been filed by the petitioner who is the wife of respondent no.2 and mother of a minor child who is presently residing with the father-respondent no.2.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had filed an application for interim custody of the child, in a case of custody filed by respondent no.2 before the trial court, which is pending and by way of an interim arrangement, the petitioner was allowed to meet her son twice a month on every first and third Saturday between 11:00 a.m. to 03:00 p.m. at the Mediation Centre of the court.

3. Being aggrieved, the petitioner had moved before the High Court and the High Court vide impugned order dated 11.11.2024 had modified the visiting time from twice a month to once in a week between 11:00 a.m. to 04:00 p.m. and also directed trial court to conclude the application for interim custody within a period of two months. But inspite of High Court’s direction to conclude the matter within a period of two months, application is still lying pending. Being aggrieved, the petitioner has moved before this Court.

4. However, it is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that the Court may dire