SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 736

SUDHANSHU DHULIA, K. VINOD CHANDRAN
Amarveer Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Reliance General Insurance Company Limited – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. C.B.Gururaj, Adv. Mr. Prakash Ranjan Nayak, AOR Mr. Animesh Dubey, Adv. Mr. Vikas Verma, AOR Ms. Sapna Verma, Adv. Mr. Shafik Ahmed, Adv. Mr. Anamay Mishra, Adv. Ms. Kavita Verma, Adv. Ms. Aakriti Yunas, Adv. Ms. Divya Goyal, Adv. Mr. Vikas Verma, Adv. Mr. Aditya Singh, AOR Mr. Kamal Kishor, Adv. Mr. Anubhav Singh, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Ms. Prerna Mehta, AOR Mr. C.B.Gururaj, Adv. Mr. Prakash Ranjan Nayak, AOR Mr. Animesh Dubey, Adv. Mr. Savita Devi, Adv. Ms. Savita Devi, Adv. Mr. Shashank Singh, AOR Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Adv. Ms. Ankita Kashyap, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded an amount of Rs. 23,15,000/-, for the death of the husband of the first claimant, who left behind him, five dependents: his wife, two minor children, and both his parents. The liability was cast on the Insurance Company who had insured the vehicle, rejecting their contention that the driver of the vehicle, the 1st respondent in the claim petition did not have an effective license and the license produced was fake.

3. The Insurance Company filed an appeal against the liability cast on them and claimants sought enhancement of compensation, in two different appeals, in which cross objections were filed by the registered owner of the offending vehicle. The High Court disposing of the appeals and the cross objections reduced the compensation for loss of income to Rs. 7,92,540/- and awarded amounts for loss of consortium to the widow @ Rs. 40,000/-, funeral expenses and loss of estate respectively @ Rs. 15,000/- each as has been held by a Constitution Bench of this Court in National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi, (2017) 16 SCC 680.

4. We heard Mr. Anamay Mishra and Mr. C.B. Gururaj, learned

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top