SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1661

NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Prem Bai Bairwa – Appellant
Versus
Smeer Alias Sameeruddeen – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Sandeep Mathur, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Alok Bakliwal, Advocate, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. Instant appeal has been preferred by the appellants-claimants (for short 'the claimants') against the judgment and award dated 17.12.2016 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal No.2, Kota (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal') in M.A.C. No.1005/2013, whereby an amount of Rs.5,38,000/- alongwith interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition was awarded as compensation in favour of the claimants.

2. Learned counsel for the claimants submits that the Tribunal wrongly decided the issue No.4 in favour of the Insurance Company and wrongly exonerated the Insurance Company. Learned counsel for the claimants also submits that it is an admitted position that driver was having a license to drive light motor vehicle at the time of accident. As per the judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Mukund Dewangan Vs. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. reported in 2017 ACJ 2011 a person who possess license to drive light motor vehicle can drive the light transport vehicle having an unladen weight upto 7500Kg. So, finding of the Tribunal regarding issue No.4 be set aside and Insurance Company be made liable to pay the amount of compensation. Learned counsel

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top