SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 767

BELA M. TRIVEDI, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
Kalyani Transco – Appellant
Versus
Bhushan Power And Steel Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Milind Kumar, AOR Mr. Manu Beri, Adv. Mrs. V. D. Khanna, AOR Mr. Arup Banerjee, AOR Mr. Diwakar Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. Mayank Kshirsagar, AOR Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv. [Not Present] Mr. Sanjay Mehta, Sr. Adv. [Not Present] Ms. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, AOR Ms. Masoom Shah, Adv. M/S. Law Associates, AOR Mr. Sandeep Bajaj, Adv. Mr. KM Nataraj, A.S.G. [Not Present] Ms. Samapika Biswal, AOR Ms. Mehak Kumar, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Soayib Qureshi, AOR Mr. Soumya Dutta, AOR Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Sr. Adv. [Not Present] Mr. Sanjiv Sen, Sr. Adv. [Not Present] M/S. Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas Aor, AOR Mr. Raunak Dhillon, Adv. Mr. S. S. Shroff, AOR Ms. Misha, Adv. M/S. Karanjawala & Co., AOR Mr. Sudarshan Lamba, AOR Mr. K.M. Nataraj, A.S.G. [Not Present] Mr. Sharath N. Nambiar, Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. Jitesh Sharma, Adv. Dr. Vinod Kumar Tewari, AOR

Table of Content
1. summary of appeals filed against nclt's judgment. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. details of the resolution process and parties involved. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. arguments presented by various stakeholders regarding the ibc. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 14 , 15 , 20)
4. judicial scrutiny must ensure compliance with mandatory provisions of the ibc. (Para 13)
5. observations on compliance and judicial scrutiny in resolution plans. (Para 32 , 33 , 39 , 47)
6. the court determines that failure to comply with ibc provisions warrants rejection of the plan. (Para 81 , 82 , 83)
7. conclusion and orders regarding the resolution plan. (Para 85 , 86 , 87)

JUDGMENT :

1. This batch of Appeals stems from the common impugned Judgment and Order dated 17.02.2020 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (For short NCLAT), New Delhi in the Company Appeals filed by the various parties.

(i) Civil Appeal No. 1808 of 2020 has been filed by the Kalyani Transco, an operational creditor of the Corporate Debtor (For short CD) M/s. Bhushan Power and Steel Limited (For short BPSL) challenging the impugned Judgment and Order dated 17.02.2020 passed by the NCLAT in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top