SUDHANSHU DHULIA, K. VINOD CHANDRAN
Renuka Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State Represented by Assistant Superintendent of Police – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
1. Prevaricating witnesses, turning hostile in Court and overzealous investigations, done in total ignorance of basic tenets of criminal law, often reduces prosecution to a mockery. Witnesses mount the box to disown prior statements, deny recoveries made, feign ignorance of aggravating circumstances spoken of during investigation and eye witnesses turn blind. Here is a classic case of 71 of the total 87 witnesses including eye-witnesses, turning hostile, leaving the prosecution to stand on the testimony of the police and official witnesses. Even a young boy, the crucial eyewitness, who saw his father being hacked to death, failed to identify the assailants.
2. The prosecution alleged that due to differences arising from sharing of assets of the father; an entrepreneur who set up several educational institutions, A1 and his brother, PW4, were at loggerheads. The deceased an employee of one of the institutions, later allotted to the share of A1, resigned to join an institution managed by PW4, after the division of assets. The enmity of A1 arises, according to the prosecution, due to the active involvement of the deceased in the sibling rivalry, aligning h
Chandrappa v. State of Karnataka
State, Govt. of NCT of Delhi v. Sunil
Rizwan Khan v. State of Chhattisgarh
State of H.P. v. Pardeep Kumar
State of Bombay v. Kathi Kalu Oghad
Mehboob Ali v. State of Rajasthan
Rajendra Singh v. State of U.P.
Naresh Chandra Das v. King-Emperor
State (NCT of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu
Rumi Bora Dutta v. State of Assam
Pandurang Kalu Patil v. State of Maharashtra
Kashmira Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Haricharan Kurmi vs. State of Bihar
(1) Murder and conspiracy – Statements made by IOs regarding motive, conspiracy and preparation comes out as prosecution story, as discernible from Section 161 statements of various witnesses who wer....
The court ruled that circumstantial evidence must establish a consistent and unbroken chain linking the accused to the crime, and any reliance on unreliability of recovery evidence warrants the benef....
Murder conviction upheld on eye-witness testimony of coordinated sharp weapon and firearm assault, corroborated by medical/ballistic evidence and circumstances; weapon recovery under Evidence Act Sec....
Circumstantial evidence can establish guilt if it forms a complete chain pointing to the accused, even without direct evidence.
Offence of Murder – Conviction upheld - Unbroken chain of circumstances unerringly pointing to the guilt of the accused - Chemical analysis report also supports the prosecution case thus providing sc....
(1) Motive acts as a double-edged sword.(2) Disclosure statement – Statement of an accused recorded by a police officer under Section 27 of Evidence Act is basically a memorandum of confession of acc....
The use of statements recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. as evidence is limited to corroboration or contradiction, and in the absence of substantial evidence, such statements cannot sustain a convict....
(1) Court will have to be conscious of witness's credibility and other evidence produced when dealing with a recovery under Section 27 of Evidence Act.(2) To attract Section 149 of IPC, prosecution h....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.