SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
VIKRAM NATH, PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ.
Vijay Kumar Joshi – Appellant
Versus
Akash Tripathi & Ors. – Respondents
Civil Appeal Nos. 6652 of 2025 (@ SLP(Civil) No. 23286 of 2019) With Civil Appeal Nos. 6653-6674 of 2025 (@ SLP(C) No. 5632-5653 of 2020), Civil Appeal Nos. 6675-6710 of 2025 (@ SLP(C) No. 6915-6950 of 2020), Civil Appeal Nos. 6711-6741 of 2025 (@ SLP(C) No. 14200-14230 of 2021), Civil Appeal Nos. 6742-6765 of 2025 (@ SLP(C) No. 4410-4433 of 2020), Civil Appeal Nos. 6766-6775 of 2025 (@ SLP(C) No. 14272-14281 of 2021), Civil Appeal Nos. 6776-6781 of 2025 (@ SLP(C) No. 14282-14287 of 2021), Civil Appeal Nos. 6782-6783 of 2025 (@ SLP(C) No. 8341-8342 of 2021), Civil Appeal Nos. 6784-6785 of 2025 (@ SLP(C) No. 8343-8344 of 2021), Civil Appeal Nos. 6786 of 2025 (@ SLP(C) No. 16808 of 2021), Civil Appeal Nos. 6787-6788 of 2025 (@ SLP(C) No. 16809-16810 of 2021), Civil Appeal Nos. 6789 of 2025 (@ SLP(C) No. 3805 of 2021)
Decided On : 13-05-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. leave granted; appeals challenging pension eligibility. (Para 1) |
| 2. admissibility of pension concerning employees after absorption. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. background of absorption policy and its implications. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. merger of co-operative societies with mpseb resolves service management issues. (Para 7) |
| 5. justice must recognize established employee benefits during disputes. (Para 8) |
| 6. judgments impacting pension rights of employees. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 7. context for appeals against previous judgments. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 8. absorption requires equal treatment in benefits for all employees. (Para 16 , 17 , 19) |
| 9. integration of services and pension benefits. (Para 20 , 22 , 23) |
| 10. precedent defines integration and rights of absorbed employees. (Para 21) |
| 11. calculation of qualifying service for pension. (Para 24 , 25) |
| 12. final ruling on pension entitlement. (Para 26 , 27) |
JUDGMENT :
Vikram Nath, J.
1. Leave granted in all the Special Leave Petitions.
2. The present appeals, except the two mentioned in paragraph 3 hereafter, assail the correctness of the judgment and order dated 22.08.2019 passed by the Full Bench of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in a bunch of Writ Appeals whereby it answered the two questions referred to it and held that the judgment of the Division Bench in the Writ Appeal No.334 of 2015, holding that the employees of the Society were entitled to pension, did not lay down the correct law and further that the employees were not entitled to the benefit of pension as claimed by them but would be governed by the terms of absorption which provided that pension and gratuity would be admissible as per the rules and regulations of the Society. These appeals further assail the consequential orders passed by the Division Bench disposing off Writ Appeals in the light of the judgment of the Full Bench dated 22.08.2019.
3. The following two appeals that arise out of SLP(C) No.23286/2019 and SLP(C) No.3805/2021 arise from separate orders passed in contempt proceedings whereby the contempt proceedings were closed. In one of the contempt proceedings, it was held that the employees had been granted pension counting their service from the date of absorption in the Madhya Pradesh State Electricity Board,1[MPSEB], whereas in the other contempt proceedings, the proceedings were dropped in view of the judgment of the Full Bench dated 22.08.2019 referred to above.
4. The only issue which is relevant for adjudication in these appeals is with regard to admissibility of pension to the employees of the Societies who were absorbed with the MPSEB and if the answer to the same is yes, then what would be the length of service to be counted i.e. whether the service rendered in the Society would also be counted for determining the qualifying period for calculation of pension or only the service rendered after absorption in the MPSEB would be counted.
5. In the State of Madhya Pradesh, large number of Co-operative Societies were registered which were involved in the work of distribution of electricity in different areas. At some stage the financial health of the Societies became poor and they were unable to manage and control their affairs, as such a policy decision was taken in 1995 to merge them with the MPSEB subject to terms and conditions being set out in all respects. In particular, with respect to the employees of the Societies both regular and daily wagers.
6. The policy decision of 1995 ultimately fructified in the year 2002 when the Societies were dissolved and the merger took place with effect from 15.03.2002 notified subsequently vide order of MPSEB dated 18.05.2004 and 14.12.2004. Further, the terms and conditions for absorption were formulated and declared by the MPSEB in its order dated 05.06.2004, which are reproduced hereunder:
Panchraj Tiwari vs. Madhya Pradesh State Electricity Board and Others
M.P. Poorva Kshetra Vidyut Vitaran Co. Ltd v. Uma Shankar Dwivedi
All absorbed employees are entitled to pension from the date of absorption, while service rendered prior to that is not counted towards qualifying service.
The Government's intention, as per the Government Order, was clear in favor of providing the benefit of counting the past service rendered by the writ petitioners in the Society towards qualifying se....
Absorption conditions in service law restrict past service benefits, emphasizing that claims must align with statutory stipulations, thus petitions challenging their constitutionality are unfounded.
The court ruled that arbitrary rejection of absorption applications based on age and literacy violates constitutional rights, mandating equal treatment for similarly situated employees.
Past services rendered by employees as Paid Managers must be recognized for pension and ACP/MACP benefits post-absorption into government service.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the entire length of service from the date of initial appointment should be considered for the purposes of fixation of pensionary benefits.
The court affirmed the right to restore commuted pensions following guidelines set by precedents and statutes, quashing prior denials.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.